DNA Replication-Current Advances 2011
DOI: 10.5772/24319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation Patterns Due to Converging Mitochondrial Replication and Transcription Increase Lifespan, and Cause Growth Rate-Longevity Tradeoffs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there are probably more mitochondrion-encoded genes than usually accepted [12,13]. Mitogenome size reduction probably causes gene multifunctionality, including mt tDNAs functioning as replication origins [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there are probably more mitochondrion-encoded genes than usually accepted [12,13]. Mitogenome size reduction probably causes gene multifunctionality, including mt tDNAs functioning as replication origins [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human mitochondria, stem-loop DNA structures define replication origins (Hixson et al, 1986; Clayton, 1992, 2000; Seligmann and Krishnan, 2006; Seligmann et al, 2006a,b; Seligmann, 2008, 2010a, 2011; Seligmann and Labra, 2014). They guide RNA processing in mitochondria (Ojala et al, 1981), and in giant viruses and their virophages (Byrne et al, 2009; Claverie and Abergel, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural genomes are frequently characterized by gradients in nucleotide biases, proportional to times spent single stranded during replication. This is typically due to hydrolytic deaminations, resulting in the observed nucleotide bias gradients across genomes due to replication [33][34][35][36][37] and/or to transcription [38,39]. Some evidences suggest that deamination gradients do not always result from chemical changes, but from coding constraints that locate genes with high deamination risks at positions where these risks are low (i.e., close to replication/transcription origin(s)) and the genes with nucleotide contents that imply lower deamination risks at locations with higher deamination risks, i.e., at genomic locations that are distant from replication/transcription origins [36,40].…”
Section: Replication Origins and Rna Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%