2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation rates at Y chromosome short tandem repeats in Texas populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Lower mutability of shorter alleles compared with longer ones has been observed several times. 32,33,12,34 Accordingly, our results show that the variation in meiosis mutation rates could be significantly explained by mean repeat count (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6). Furthermore, when no diversity variable is included in the model, both repeat count and repeat motif contribute independently to explain the mutation rate variability (ie, model m3, Supplementary Table S5).…”
Section: Mutation Rate Estimates For Y-strsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Lower mutability of shorter alleles compared with longer ones has been observed several times. 32,33,12,34 Accordingly, our results show that the variation in meiosis mutation rates could be significantly explained by mean repeat count (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6). Furthermore, when no diversity variable is included in the model, both repeat count and repeat motif contribute independently to explain the mutation rate variability (ie, model m3, Supplementary Table S5).…”
Section: Mutation Rate Estimates For Y-strsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, violations of this assumption have been reported both in phylogenetic and meiosis studies (eg, Dupuy et al, Ge et al, Forster et al and Nebel et al 33,34,38,39 ), suggesting that more complex models than SMM would better explain microsatellite variation. The ratio of variances in number of repeats between two loci can be still considered a good estimator of the ratio of mutation rates even in case of multistep mutations, provided that deviation from the SMM is similar for both loci (cf.…”
Section: Mutation Rate Estimates For Y-strsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were read from a 3730 sequencer (Supplementary Table S2), and ages of each clade was estimated from the median-joining networks within Network 4.6.1.1 (Fluxus) using the rho statistic. Both the evolutionary (6.9 × 10 − 4 per STR per generation) and the observed genealogical (2.1 × 10 − 3 per STR per generation) mutation rate were applied in this study, 24,25 assuming a generation time of 25 years. A Contour map was drawn based on the frequency distribution of Haplogroup O*-M134(xM117) generated in this study and previously published data (Supplementary Table S3) using the Kriging procedure with the aid of the Surfer 8.0 Software (Golden Software, Golden, CO, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is required for fitting mutation models with alleledependent mutation rates. For studies that did not provide paternal allele frequencies, we tried to approximate these as follows: For four studies (Kayser et al 2000;Budowle et al 2005;Ge et al 2009;Goedbloed et al 2009), estimates were equated to the respective allele frequencies as reported for the relevant subpopulations in the Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (Willuweit and Roewer 2007), Release 31. For the remaining studies, we adopted the allele frequencies reported in the studies themselves, although these estimates included not only fathers, but also unrelated individuals.…”
Section: Y-strsmentioning
confidence: 99%