1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3103-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The classic mutation analysis in Drosophila first demonstrated the transmission of genomic instability to subsequent generations of males treated with X-rays and mustard gas (Auerbach, 1976). Unfortunately however, the marker of mutation used in these classic studies was the lethality which tells little about the nature of mutation.…”
Section: Radiation Induction Of Transgenerational Genomic Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic mutation analysis in Drosophila first demonstrated the transmission of genomic instability to subsequent generations of males treated with X-rays and mustard gas (Auerbach, 1976). Unfortunately however, the marker of mutation used in these classic studies was the lethality which tells little about the nature of mutation.…”
Section: Radiation Induction Of Transgenerational Genomic Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenerational destabilization of genome was first reported for the induction of the lethal mutation in germ cells of the subsequent generations of mustard gas-treated Drosophila melanogaster (40). Transgenerational carcinogenesis and teratogenesis might also be the manifestation of the genomic instability in somatic cells of F 1 mice born to irradiated parents (41,42).…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation events are "spontaneous" only because we do not know all of their causes. Environmental influences such as temperature, age, transcription crrors, and mutagenic and infectious agents are well-known, but probably play a comparatively minor role in natural populations (Auerbach, 1976;Woodruff et al, 1982). Much more potent are genetic modifiers which appear to be at least indirectly involved in the evolution of mutation rates.…”
Section: Nomadic Dna and Mutation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%