2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11869-021-00994-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation test and multiple-wavelet coherence of PM2.5 concentration in Guiyang, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally accepted by researchers that anthropogenic emissions account for the short cycle (daily, weekly) of PM 2.5 and seasonal climatic factors account for the long cycle (monthly, quarterly, semiannually, annually) [ [46] , [47] , [48] ]. Still, there is no clear explanation for the formation of ozone periodicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted by researchers that anthropogenic emissions account for the short cycle (daily, weekly) of PM 2.5 and seasonal climatic factors account for the long cycle (monthly, quarterly, semiannually, annually) [ [46] , [47] , [48] ]. Still, there is no clear explanation for the formation of ozone periodicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the amplitude of the response of PM 2.5 pollution to NO 2 is the fourth largest among all precursors, with PM 2.5 response values to NO 2 higher than +3 µg m −3 in parts of the Ji-Lu-Yu region in 2015. This may be due to the positive feedback of PM 2.5 pollution on NO 2 [33,62,63]. Compared with 2010, the NO 2 concentration (shown in Figure S5) in 2011-2012 in the central and southern NCP was lower, so the response value of PM 2.5 to NO 2 in 2011-2012 was negative.…”
Section: Pm 25 and O 3 Collaborative Pollution Response To Each Precu...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to SO 2 , the amplitude of the PM 2.5 response to NO 2 was the second largest among all precursors, with values of the PM 2.5 response to NO 2 higher than +5 µg m −3 in western PRD in 2014. This may be due to the positive feedback of PM 2.5 pollution on NO 2 [33,62,63]. In 2011-2013, NO 2 concentration (shown in Figure S12) in the PRD was lower than that in 2010, so values of PM 2.5 response to NO 2 were negative in this region.…”
Section: Pm 25 and O 3 Collaborative Pollution Response To Each Precu...mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation