2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.7008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational analysis of K-RAS and EGFR implicates K-RAS as a resistance marker in the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial S0126 of bronchioalveolar carcinoma (BAC) patients (pts) treated with gefitinib

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a mutation in the K-ras gene, which mediates EGFR signaling, may also confer resistance to TKIs [28,79]. If confirmed, these findings suggest that screening for such mutations may identify patients who are more, or less, likely to respond to gefitinib.…”
Section: Gefitinibmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, a mutation in the K-ras gene, which mediates EGFR signaling, may also confer resistance to TKIs [28,79]. If confirmed, these findings suggest that screening for such mutations may identify patients who are more, or less, likely to respond to gefitinib.…”
Section: Gefitinibmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent analysis from BR.21 study has suggested that there was an unusually high EGFR mutation rate (23% of the 177 patients for whom tumour tissue was adequate for the study), with a low positive predictive value (16%) and a higher response rate (20% versus 2.4%) in patients with a high versus a low EGFR copy number, respectively [77]. Dr. Paul Gumerlock has also reported a response rate in 23% of patients with an EGFR mutation versus 13% of those with wild-type EGFR, and in 26% of those with a high copy number versus 11% of those with a low one, with k-ras mutations being a possible resistance marker for response [78]. At the same time, higher results (53% to 100%) were reported by other groups regarding the positive predictive role of an EGFR mutation [79][80][81].…”
Section: Other Egfr-tkismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such characteristics are likely to be linked to molecular differences in EGFR or its associated signaling pathways, but these differences have not yet been clearly identified. Relationships between expression of EGFR, pMAPK, and pAkt and response to EGFR TKIs also remain to be firmly established as results have been contradictory [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72], but there is some evidence that amplification of the EGFR gene may be linked to a higher likelihood of response and extended survival for patients with NSCLC [73,74]. Recent findings also suggest that somatic mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain may predict for good response to erlotinib and gefitinib treatment [66,73,[75][76][77][78][79], whereas K-ras mutations may be associated with poor clinical outcome for these patients [66,73].…”
Section: Erlotinibmentioning
confidence: 95%