1989
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03560.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational analysis of SEC4 suggests a cyclical mechanism for the regulation of vesicular traffic.

Abstract: Mutant alleles of SEC4, an essential gene required for the final stage of secretion in yeast, have been generated by in vitro mutagenesis. Deletion of the two cysteine residues at the C terminus of the protein results in a soluble non‐functional protein, indicating that those two residues are required for normal localization of Sec4p to secretory vesicles and the plasma membrane. A mutant allele of SEC4 generated to mimic an activated, transforming allele of H‐ras, as predicted, does not bind GTP. The presence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
214
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
214
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations contrast with those of several other GTPases, such as Ras, Rab5, and Rab7, whose function is augmented by expression of "dominant-active" GTPase hydrolysis mutants, resulting in a phenotype opposite that of cells expressing the "dominant-negative" GTPbinding mutant (Barbacid, 1987;Stenmark et al, 1994;Bucci et al, 2000). However, in this respect Rab10 is similar to the closely related Sec4p, whose function is inhibited by overexpression of either the GTP-binding or GTP-hydrolysis mutants (Walworth et al, 1989(Walworth et al, , 1992. Thus unlike Ras, the function of Rab10 and Sec4p may not depend upon the level of the GTP-bound form so much as upon a cycle of GTP binding and hydrolysis.…”
Section: Mechanism Of the Inhibitory Effects Of Mutant Forms Of Gfp-rmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These observations contrast with those of several other GTPases, such as Ras, Rab5, and Rab7, whose function is augmented by expression of "dominant-active" GTPase hydrolysis mutants, resulting in a phenotype opposite that of cells expressing the "dominant-negative" GTPbinding mutant (Barbacid, 1987;Stenmark et al, 1994;Bucci et al, 2000). However, in this respect Rab10 is similar to the closely related Sec4p, whose function is inhibited by overexpression of either the GTP-binding or GTP-hydrolysis mutants (Walworth et al, 1989(Walworth et al, , 1992. Thus unlike Ras, the function of Rab10 and Sec4p may not depend upon the level of the GTP-bound form so much as upon a cycle of GTP binding and hydrolysis.…”
Section: Mechanism Of the Inhibitory Effects Of Mutant Forms Of Gfp-rmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The corresponding mutations in Ras, Rab7, Rab8, Rab11a, and Rab25 have been shown to decrease the affinity of the protein for GTP, resulting in the accumulation of a GDP-bound form (Feig and Cooper, 1988;Peranen et al, 1996;Bucci et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2000). This mutation frequently results in a protein with dominant-negative effects on Rab function; overexpression has been found to alter the function of Rab8 (Moritz et al, 2001) and yeast Sec4p (Walworth et al, 1989), as well as Rab4 (McCaffrey et al, 2001), Rab5 , Rab7 (Feng et al, 1995;Bucci et al, 2000), Rab11 (Ullrich et al, 1996;Wang et al, 2000a), Rab14 (Jununtula et al, 2004), and Rab15 (Zuk and Elferink, 2000). A second mutant was also created, encoding a change from glutamine into leucine at position 68 (Q68L).…”
Section: Mutations In the Gtp-binding And Gtp-hydrolysis Domains Altementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, if regulation of CK1 activity occurs, it may be through posttranslational modification, through association with other polypeptides (e.g., a regulatory subunit), or through limitation of its access to physiological substrates by changes in its subcellular distribution. Regarding this last possibility, it has been proposed that the membrane association of other CC motif-containing proteins (YPT1 and SEC4) is reversible (Walworth et al, 1989). The predicted mass of yeast CK1 (:62 kDa) is larger than the 54-kDa protein we purified at the outset (Kuret, A M 1 2 unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Our results thus suggest that the association of Mso1p with Sec1p is not regulated by the GTPase activity of Sec4p. Sec4-8p binds poorly GTP, Sec4N34 binds preferentially GDP, whereas Sec4I133p is presumably defective both in GDP and GTP binding (Walworth et al, 1989). Although, Sec4N34p and I133 mutants bind similarly the Sec4p function regulating proteins Sec2p and Dss1p Walch-Solimena et al, 1997), these mutants are likely to posses slightly different conformations due to their different nucleotide binding properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%