2016
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-679167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational hierarchies in myelodysplastic syndromes dynamically adapt and evolve upon therapy response and failure

Abstract: Key Points Mutational trajectories are defined by complex patterns of molecular heterogeneity in MDS, including lower-risk cases. Therapeutic intervention dynamically reshapes mutational patterns often resulting in branched or independent evolution of MDS clones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
123
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
9
123
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenotypic effects seen here with CMML xenotransplantation over a relatively short timeframe are unique given that previously published xenograft models of MDS [31][32][33] and aggressive MPNs such as myelofibrosis 48 do not result in overt phenotypic effects despite engraftment with human diseased cells. The high levels of human engraftment achieved here across numerous tissues with resulting lethality, cytopenias, and hepatosplenomegaly render these models very useful in preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches for CMML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phenotypic effects seen here with CMML xenotransplantation over a relatively short timeframe are unique given that previously published xenograft models of MDS [31][32][33] and aggressive MPNs such as myelofibrosis 48 do not result in overt phenotypic effects despite engraftment with human diseased cells. The high levels of human engraftment achieved here across numerous tissues with resulting lethality, cytopenias, and hepatosplenomegaly render these models very useful in preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches for CMML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 NSGS and MISTRG mice have already demonstrated improved engraftment of myeloid cells and myeloid cell output of normal CD34 1 cells as well as subtypes of AML that previously engrafted at low rates in NSG mice. [26][27][28][29][30] However, robust xenotransplantation models are still lacking for several chronic myeloid neoplasms, particularly MDS [31][32][33] and CMML. Given the known hypersensitivity of CMML and JMML to GM-CSF, we evaluated engraftment of CMML and JMML in NSGS mice here and identified highly robust engraftment of CD34 1 cells as well as mononuclear cells (MNCs) from BM and peripheral blood (PB) from CMML and JMML patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progression of MDS into secondary AML has been reported to be linked to clonal evolution, which can be related to the emergence or variations of genomic anomalies 8 . These observations, supported by recent studies [9][10][11] , led us to address the appearance and evolution of TP53-mutated subclones in lower-risk del(5q) MDS patients along the course of the disease. We thus retrospectively screened for TP53 mutations in a cohort of such MDS patients who received lenalidomide in the course of their treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…27 The data are also reminiscent to other myeloid neoplasms and their clonal diversity, in which mutations in RUNX1, N/KRAS or IDH2 were also identified as late events and drivers for disease progression. 19,[28][29][30][31] Of interest, no significant increase in clone size was observed for mutations in TET2 or SRSF2, although they represent early mutations in the multistep pathogenesis of SM, 8 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, 32 or MDS. 19 These results suggest that the extensive clinical heterogeneity of advSM is most likely because of the presence and dynamic evolution of several molecularly disparate subclones, which have a variable impact on clinical characteristics and response to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] The sequential NGS approach is based on library preparation by the Access Array Technology (Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA) and sequencing on the MiSeq Instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Gene mutations were annotated using the reference sequence of the Ensembl Transcript ID (Ensembl release 85: July 2016).…”
Section: Targeted Next-generation Sequencing (Ngs) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%