2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational Landscape and Outcomes of Conjunctival Melanoma in 101 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…evaluated genetic mutations and molecular genetic pathways in CM and reported that loss of ATRX and ALT may be early events in CM. They also confirmed that NRAS mutation implied an increased risk for metastasis and death in CM ( 44 ). Though mutations are frequently present in CM, little is known about prognostic genetic biomarkers due to the low incidence of this disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…evaluated genetic mutations and molecular genetic pathways in CM and reported that loss of ATRX and ALT may be early events in CM. They also confirmed that NRAS mutation implied an increased risk for metastasis and death in CM ( 44 ). Though mutations are frequently present in CM, little is known about prognostic genetic biomarkers due to the low incidence of this disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“… 18 Additional mutations in the TERT promoter and ATRX may be indicate progression to melanoma. 19 , 20 TERT promoter mutations have been associated with metastatic disease in conjunctival melanoma. 19 Moreover, TERT promoter mutations have been described in PAM with moderate and severe atypia, underlining their potential as melanoma in situ lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 While recently studies have identified specific genetic mutations, such as NRAS, as contributing toward increased risk for metastasis and death, many of the tumors in this cohort were treated prior to the implementation of genetic testing, so genetic analysis was not feasible. 22 The study strengths include the large number of patients with a rare cancer in this study cohort and the comprehensive and detailed single-center data collection over a long-term period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%