2020
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations in the HvMKK3 and HvAlaAT1 genes affect barley preharvest sprouting and after‐ripened seed dormancy

Abstract: Preharvest sprouting (PHS) is a natural phenomenon that negatively impacts various crops across the globe when late season rainfall causes seeds to germinate prior to harvest. Prevention of PHS in small grains such as barley and wheat is of particular importance due to the large acreage devoted to them. Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is the fourth most grown cereal This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.crop and is often susceptible to PHS damage, which limits the regions in which barley can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SD1 was initially identified as a seed dormancy QTL in barley by Oberthur et al. (1995) and its role in long‐term seed dormancy has been further examined by many authors (Han et al., 1999); Romagosa et al., 1999); Sato et al., 2016); Vetch et al., 2020). HvAlaAT1‐SD1 has not been observed to affect PHS when phenotyped within 7 d of PM (Ullrich et al., 2009; Vetch et al., 2020) but has been associated with GE at PM 7 (Bonnardeaux et al., 2008; Prada et al., 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SD1 was initially identified as a seed dormancy QTL in barley by Oberthur et al. (1995) and its role in long‐term seed dormancy has been further examined by many authors (Han et al., 1999); Romagosa et al., 1999); Sato et al., 2016); Vetch et al., 2020). HvAlaAT1‐SD1 has not been observed to affect PHS when phenotyped within 7 d of PM (Ullrich et al., 2009; Vetch et al., 2020) but has been associated with GE at PM 7 (Bonnardeaux et al., 2008; Prada et al., 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMS‐induced Qsd2 mutant has a different genetic background and the environmental conditions and methods used for its analysis were different from those used in our current work, so it is not possible to make an exact comparison, but the EMS mutant seems to have moderately prolonged dormancy compared with our qsd2 mutants in this study (Nakamura et al ., 2016 ). We hypothesize that barley cultivation and breeding have selected alleles with enhanced function at Qsd1 and Qsd2 to promote rapid germination, from the pool of natural alleles represented among barley cultivars (Nakamura et al ., 2016 ; Sato et al ., 2016 ; Vetch et al ., 2020 ). We attempted to break dormancy by using the high temperature of 40 °C for 4 weeks, with a dormant after‐ripening period of 10 weeks; however, even under these extreme conditions, the germination of all mutants was still significant delayed at 25 °C, thus preventing a comparative analysis of the individual contribution of Qsd1 and Qsd2 to dormancy (Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other MTAs were identified with GWA analysis on the logistic parameters. Surprisingly, the SD1 region was not identified with either the centering or the rate parameter with the full logistic model, despite its consistent qualitative, if not quantitative, association with changing the rate of dormancy loss (Sato et al., 2016; Sweeney, Rooney, Walling, & Sorrells, 2021; Vetch et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2016), a SNP in the untranslated translated region of HvGA20ox1 on chromosome 5H, and the SNP identified to be the causative mutation in HvMKK3 responsible for loss of primary dormancy by Vetch et al. (2020) within North American germplasm. See Sweeney, Rooney, Walling, and Sorrells (2021) for a detailed description of these markers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation