1994
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.68.2.1196-1199.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations of polyomavirus VP1 allow in vitro growth in undifferentiated cells and modify in vivo tissue replication specificity

Abstract: Mutants of polyomavirus with altered host specificities were isolated in undifferentiated C2 myoblast cells (L. Ricci, R. Maione, C. Passananti, A. Felsani, and P. Amati, J. Virol. 66:7153-7158, 1992). The mutations responsible for this phenotype belonged to either of the two classes: a large duplication of the enhancer region or a 6-bp deletion in the VP1 coding region. Since both classes of mutations enabled the virus to grow in undifferentiated myoblast cells, we investigated their ability to replicate in e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A determinant responsible for efficient virus spread and induction of tumors has been mapped to a single amino acid in the major capsid protein VP1 (9,13). Determinants that alter the spectrum of tissues in which polyomavirus can replicate in the mouse have also been mapped to VP1 (22). Mutations in the tumor antigens that block or reduce the virus's ability to transform cells in vitro (18,23) inhibit or alter its tumorigenicity in the mouse (9,11,14,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A determinant responsible for efficient virus spread and induction of tumors has been mapped to a single amino acid in the major capsid protein VP1 (9,13). Determinants that alter the spectrum of tissues in which polyomavirus can replicate in the mouse have also been mapped to VP1 (22). Mutations in the tumor antigens that block or reduce the virus's ability to transform cells in vitro (18,23) inhibit or alter its tumorigenicity in the mouse (9,11,14,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VP1 1–136 shows to be totally unable to activate the reporter genes even in presence of YY1, therefore, indicating that aa 137–140 are required for VP1‐YY1 interaction in this experimental system and that the interacting sites with the yeast factor and YY1 are distinguishable. Since our previous results indicated that the D‐E loop of VP1 could be responsible for the viral‐host specificity [18,19] and may be involved in the formation of the complex of the viral genome with the NM (Amati et al, manuscript in preparation), we fused the sequences encoding the D‐E 118–170 or the E‐F 172–248 loops with the GAL4 DNA‐BD. The results of the 2HS as in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from our and other laboratories [16–21] had suggested the possibility that VP1, the major capsid protein, could determine alterations in the host specificity of growth and tumorigenicity. In order to determine the possible mechanisms that allow the encapsidated polyomaviruses that reach the cell nucleus to associate with the NM, we investigated the possible role of YY1 in this necessary step of viral function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the phosphorylated Ser-63, Thr-66 and Thr-156 residues of murine polyomavirus VP1 are not conserved in the VP1 proteins of the other polyomaviruses. Thus, although these viruses belong to the same family, their VP1 sequences have low similarity and therefore modification of the capsid proteins may affect various biological functions, such as host range, tissue tropism and pathogenesis, in different ways (Freund et al, 1991;Mezes & Amati, 1994). In the current study, the phosphorylated residues of BK VP1, including Ser-80, Ser-133 and Ser-327, are distinct from those of polyomavirus VP1, where phosphorylation occurs at Ser-63, Thr-66 and Thr-156.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%