2015
DOI: 10.17352/2455-5487.000018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutifidus in Spinal Stability: Analysis of Inhibition with Muscle Activation Techniques

Abstract: Objectives: To (1) study the relationship between multifidus muscle activation and perception, (2) to explore the correlation between the failure of the multifidus and back pain, when (3) tested with the MAT technique and back pain questionnaire.Design: Three months prospective before/after quality improvement project. Participants:The participant sample consisted of 34 volunteers (30.5 ± 8.2 years).Intervention: Lumbar disability was calculated using the Oswetry test, along with a neuropropioceptive multifidu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the response could be altered in these vulnerable positions and could lead to injury ( López-Chicharro & Fernández-Vaquero, 2006 ). In this line of knowledge, manual tests have been used to detect neuroproprioceptive vulnerability based on the subjective assessment of strength in positions of maximum muscle shortening ( Blasco, Bernabé & Berbel, 2015 ). However, isometric strength has been traditionally measured by manual dynamometry with reliability, accuracy and ease of application ( Schaubert & Bohannon, 2005 ; Bohannon, 1986b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the response could be altered in these vulnerable positions and could lead to injury ( López-Chicharro & Fernández-Vaquero, 2006 ). In this line of knowledge, manual tests have been used to detect neuroproprioceptive vulnerability based on the subjective assessment of strength in positions of maximum muscle shortening ( Blasco, Bernabé & Berbel, 2015 ). However, isometric strength has been traditionally measured by manual dynamometry with reliability, accuracy and ease of application ( Schaubert & Bohannon, 2005 ; Bohannon, 1986b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%