2007
DOI: 10.1080/17524030701642595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muting the Voice of the Local in the Age of the Global: How Communication Practices Compromised Public Participation in India's Allain Dunhangan Environmental Impact Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were made by Gray and Edward-Jones (2003), Paliwal (2006), Martin (2007), Sandham and Pretorius (2008) and Jalava et al (2010).…”
Section: Details Drugs Cement Highway Oilsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar observations were made by Gray and Edward-Jones (2003), Paliwal (2006), Martin (2007), Sandham and Pretorius (2008) and Jalava et al (2010).…”
Section: Details Drugs Cement Highway Oilsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…With a long tradition of studying public participation and decision making, environmental communication contributes critical insights to our understanding of (in)effective collaborations, participatory engagement, and environmental decision making [8,30,31]. For example, studies repeatedly demonstrate that processes that employ participatory communication strategies improve stakeholder experiences [32] and decision making [33], while ineffective processes can significantly harm the quality of decision making and stakeholder trust [15,34]. Researchers in the fields of applied anthropology and political science offer insights on critical features of partnerships [11,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voice may be hindered through discursive closure (Deetz, 1992). In such cases discussion is unintentionally stifled or closed via a number of potential conversation mechanisms including but not limited to: naturalization-a given behavior is deemed natural and therefore not open to discussion; neutralization-a topic of discussion appears uncontestable because the "facts" appear neutral (such as statistics, for example, see Martin, 2007)-or pacification-a conversation appears to engage others but works contrarily to shut down or effectively stifle interaction.…”
Section: Participative Democracy and Voicementioning
confidence: 98%