2021
DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2021.1890574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Aid in north London during the Covid-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encouraging the engagement of members in community activities can boost the psychological sense of belongingness through member interactions and the mere realization that neighbors and community members will help in an emergency, especially when the state‐response is inadequate. Such autonomous community initiatives were enacted successfully by North‐London mutual aid groups, during the lockdown (Chevée, 2021) distributing and securing essentials (e.g., food and medication) to vulnerable and neglected populations during the lockdown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraging the engagement of members in community activities can boost the psychological sense of belongingness through member interactions and the mere realization that neighbors and community members will help in an emergency, especially when the state‐response is inadequate. Such autonomous community initiatives were enacted successfully by North‐London mutual aid groups, during the lockdown (Chevée, 2021) distributing and securing essentials (e.g., food and medication) to vulnerable and neglected populations during the lockdown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She describes how shortlived and ephemeral Self-organised Social Solidarity (Internet-based and supported) becomes more important than NGOs and public institutions in moments of sudden crises that require prompt responses. Research on grassroots activism during the Covid-19 pandemic supports these findings (Chevée, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Interviews of MK-based volunteers confirms that some organisations were able to respond in a matter of days but for others it was weeks before they could adapt to the new situation and provide safe and effective support to those who needed it. Volunteer and community organisations benefited from their pre-existing knowledge of vulnerable individuals [42] and were able to reach and support people that robots could not reach, but they could not easily identify and reach people who had not considered themselves vulnerable before the pandemic. Those same individuals were potentially excluded from government initiatives intended to ensure that vulnerable people could get food [43], which were subject to triage [44] and in consequence excluded some individuals who considered themselves vulnerable but were not considered a priority.…”
Section: Robots and Vulnerable Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%