2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3743-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual authentication for vehicular network in complex and uncertain driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their protocol, they eliminated the need for preloading the master key of the system into Tamper-Proof Security and Communication Networks Device (TPD) of vehicle, thus avoiding the risk of compromising a vehicle's TPD leading to entire system failure. Some mutual authentication schemes [40][41][42] in other different scenarios have been proposed. Recently, Cui et al [6] introduced a secure mutual authentication for VANETs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their protocol, they eliminated the need for preloading the master key of the system into Tamper-Proof Security and Communication Networks Device (TPD) of vehicle, thus avoiding the risk of compromising a vehicle's TPD leading to entire system failure. Some mutual authentication schemes [40][41][42] in other different scenarios have been proposed. Recently, Cui et al [6] introduced a secure mutual authentication for VANETs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [187] had communicated that different authentication schemes for multi-authentication models are proposed and connected to numerous zones, however less in the IoV. The authors, therefore, had proposed another Mutual Authentication and the Key Agreement Scheme (LEANDER) under multi-server design for Long-Term development for Vehicle (LTE-V) to organize for unsure driving conditions.…”
Section: Privacy and Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We began our research on the technology, platform, and transfer of information concerning driving brain cognition for intelligent vehicles in 2014 [36][37][38]. Since 2016, we have been studying how V2X vehicles and subsystems should authenticate with each other [2,39,[40][41][42][43][44]. e spatiotemporal event interaction model architecture is shown in Figure 1, which includes both individual intelligent vehicles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%