2016
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2016.2591058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Coupling Reduction by Novel Fractal Defected Ground Structure Bandgap Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To eliminate mutual coupling between the antenna elements of a MIMO system, various design techniques are reported such as the use of defected ground structure (DGS), which exhibits band stop property over the operating band. However, the design utilizes large edge‐to‐edge space geometry due to placement of DGS in between the antenna elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate mutual coupling between the antenna elements of a MIMO system, various design techniques are reported such as the use of defected ground structure (DGS), which exhibits band stop property over the operating band. However, the design utilizes large edge‐to‐edge space geometry due to placement of DGS in between the antenna elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been proposed to reduce the mutual coupling while the array elements are maintained close to each other. These methods utilize different parasitic elements, defected ground structures (DGS) polarization conversion isolators, metamaterial‐based DGSs, and electromagnetic band‐gap structures, and can considerably reduce the mutual coupling. However, they have some limitations: 1‐ they need a larger space or multiple layers for implementation, which increases the total size or the physical separation between antenna elements or leads to destructive effects on the radiations, 2‐ they have high design and fabrication complexity and cost, and 3‐ their back‐side radiation is increased which causes the front‐to‐back ratio and so the array gain to be reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various efficient techniques and different types of isolation structures have been designed and analyzed to reduce the mutual coupling between MSAs. They include the optimization of the antenna dimensions so that the surface wave is not excited, printing various patterns on or within the substrate known as an electromagnetic bandgap structure, , or etching structures away from ground plane known as defected ground structure (DGS) , . The appropriate design of the extra structure in between the antennas creates an indirect signal coming via the further coupling path that opposes the signal going directly from element to element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%