Mutual Development

Mørch, Anders I.; Andersen, Renate

doi:10.4018/joeuc.2010101902

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The creation of tasks in P2PU is completely open to participants. Mutual development emphasizes interaction between professional developers and end users in product development processes and focuses on active participants in both design and use (Mørch & Andersen, 2010). Excerpts 5 and 6 point at the interaction between users and organizers when co-creating tasks, which is in line with mutual development (Andersen & Mørch, 2009).…”

Section: Excerptmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Mutual development, first proposed as a process model, describes how professional developers and users interact in customer-initiated product development processes (Andersen & Mørch, 2009;Mørch & Andersen, 2010). During processes of mutual development, customers and professional developers interact in mutually beneficial ways when further developing an already existing product.…”

Section: Mutual Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: challenges and opportunities

Andersen

Ponti

2014

Distance Education

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents an empirical study of an open educational course in an online peer-to-peer university (P2PU). P2PU is a nonprofit organization offering free educational opportunities. Focus is on how peers are part of creating course content in a Web 2.0 environment. Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have evolved into two different pedagogical directions: content-based xMOOCs and connectivist cMOOCs. cMOOCs emphasizing learning in networks developed informally, where learners are part of creating course content, resemble P2PU`s vision. We investigated processes of interaction in co-creation of tasks in an open educational course and what opportunities and challenges emerge. We employed template analysis for coding data. We report two different processes of interaction between users and organizers: problem identification and co-creation of tasks. This study contributes to understanding a new model of teaching and learning through scrutinizing participation in an open educational course and explores implications for the learning experience.

show abstract

Section: Excerptmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Mutual Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: challenges and opportunities

Andersen

Ponti

2014

Distance Education

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Information Seeking and Collaborative Knowledge Creation: Exploring Collaborative Learning in Customer Service Work and Software Product Development

Mørch

2013

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How Do Users Perceive a Design-in-Use Approach to Implementation? A Healthcare Case

Hertzum¹,

Torkilsheyggi²

2019

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of information systems in organizational settings is a protracted process that includes the mutual adaptation of system and organization to each other after the system has gone live. We investigate a design-in-use approach to this implementation process. Rather than a centrally run implementation process with preset goals, the management in the studied hospital tasked the individual departments with exploring and embracing the possibilities afforded by a network of interconnected electronic whiteboards. The responsibility for driving this process was assigned to local super users in the departments. On the basis of interviews with 17 clinicians we find that (a) they perceive the design-in-use approach in conflicting ways, (b) the super users are more positive about the approach than the end-users, (c) standardization across departments conflicts with design in use within departments, (d) intradepartmental change is perceived more positively, (e) the design-in-use process is inextricably sociotechnical, and (f) the clinicians' perception of design in use is more about implementing change than about preparing it or about training and support. The conflicting perceptions of the design-in-use approach, for example, include whether it gained momentum, met local needs, and made for an engaging process. We discuss the implications of our findings for a design-in-use approach to implementation.

show abstract

Mutual Development

Cited by 6 publications

References 30 publications

Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: challenges and opportunities

Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: challenges and opportunities

Information Seeking and Collaborative Knowledge Creation: Exploring Collaborative Learning in Customer Service Work and Software Product Development

How Do Users Perceive a Design-in-Use Approach to Implementation? A Healthcare Case

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About