2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Enhancement for Detection of Multiple Logos in Sports Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the performance of DETR-FP against a strong Faster-RCNN baseline in the task of Logo detection concretely in the QMUL-Openlogo benchmark [12]. The dataset is comprised of 27,083 images from 352 logo classes, built by aggregating and refining seven other logo datasets [58], [59], [67]- [71]. We use weights from ImageNet and MS-COCO [11] in different experiments for both architectures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the performance of DETR-FP against a strong Faster-RCNN baseline in the task of Logo detection concretely in the QMUL-Openlogo benchmark [12]. The dataset is comprised of 27,083 images from 352 logo classes, built by aggregating and refining seven other logo datasets [58], [59], [67]- [71]. We use weights from ImageNet and MS-COCO [11] in different experiments for both architectures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classes Images Availability BelgaLogos (Joly and Buisson, 2009) 37 1,321 FlickrLogos-27 (Kalantidis et al, 2011) 27 810 FlickrLogos-32 (Romberg et al, 2011) 32 2,240 Logo32plus (Bianco et al, 2017) 32 7,830 Logo-In-The-Wild (Tzk. et al, 2018) 1196 9,393 SportsLogo (Liao et al, 2017) 20 1,978 MICC-Logos (Sahbi et al, 2012) 13 720 LOGO-NET (Hoi et al, 2015) 160 73,414 OpenLogo (Su et al, 2018) 352 27,083 been a number of logo detection datasets developed in the literature (Joly and Buisson, 2009;Kalantidis et al, 2011;Romberg et al, 2011;Bianco et al, 2017;Tzk. et al, 2018;Liao et al, 2017;Sahbi et al, 2012;Hoi et al, 2015;Su et al, 2018) (Table 1).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al, 2018) 1196 9,393 SportsLogo (Liao et al, 2017) 20 1,978 MICC-Logos (Sahbi et al, 2012) 13 720 LOGO-NET (Hoi et al, 2015) 160 73,414 OpenLogo (Su et al, 2018) 352 27,083 been a number of logo detection datasets developed in the literature (Joly and Buisson, 2009;Kalantidis et al, 2011;Romberg et al, 2011;Bianco et al, 2017;Tzk. et al, 2018;Liao et al, 2017;Sahbi et al, 2012;Hoi et al, 2015;Su et al, 2018) (Table 1). However, their scaling ability is limited in terms of both class and image, due to the high cost of collecting and labelling in-the-wild logo images.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 (c)). Existing logo detection methods typically consider a small number of logo classes with the need for large sized training data annotated with object bounding boxes [2,14,15,19,20,24,31,32,33]. Whilst this controlled setting allows for a straightforward adoption of the state-of-the-art general object detection models [6,28,30], it is unscalable to dynamic real-world logo detection applications where more new logo classes become of interest during model deployment, with the availability of only their clean design images (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%