2024
DOI: 10.1109/tcss.2023.3325264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Influence in Citation and Cooperation Patterns

Chenbo Fu,
Haogeng Luo,
Xuejiao Liang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the specific cases of the USA and China, this phenomenon is also related to the high academic production on CBET (Figure 4) and also reflects the growing interest within the scientific community towards articles produced by these countries. Overall, it is confirmed that the creation of networks of scientific collaboration generates a greater number of citations compared to research conducted individually [84][85][86]. However, some authors warn that citation-based metrics could be partially biased due to self-citations by authors and their collaborators, which would increase the frequency of citation [54,86].…”
Section: Collaboration Network and Most Cited Countriesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the specific cases of the USA and China, this phenomenon is also related to the high academic production on CBET (Figure 4) and also reflects the growing interest within the scientific community towards articles produced by these countries. Overall, it is confirmed that the creation of networks of scientific collaboration generates a greater number of citations compared to research conducted individually [84][85][86]. However, some authors warn that citation-based metrics could be partially biased due to self-citations by authors and their collaborators, which would increase the frequency of citation [54,86].…”
Section: Collaboration Network and Most Cited Countriesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Overall, it is confirmed that the creation of networks of scientific collaboration generates a greater number of citations compared to research conducted individually [84][85][86]. However, some authors warn that citation-based metrics could be partially biased due to self-citations by authors and their collaborators, which would increase the frequency of citation [54,86].…”
Section: Collaboration Network and Most Cited Countriesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Collaboration is an essential scientific activity and plays an important role in academic research. The high benefits of collaboration (e.g., team collaboration produces more highquality outputs and attracts more citations than individuals [7][8][9]) increase the number and size of team collaborations and become more and more dominant. Furthermore, the emergence of modern science's large-scale and complex trend has forced researchers to expand their knowledge and share high-precision instruments, making collaborations the inevitable choice [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%