2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-018-1591-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual information analysis to approach nonlinearity in groundwater stochastic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutual Information turns out to be null in case of independent random variables, while the equality H(X) = H(Z) = I(X; Z) holds in case that the knowledge of one variable is sufficient to predicted the other one exactly. Mutual Information is again measured in nats as in (4). It is important to recall here that mutual information is a nonlinear dependence metric, i.e., it is capable of detecting dependence between random variables which are not induced by a linear relationship.…”
Section: Information Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mutual Information turns out to be null in case of independent random variables, while the equality H(X) = H(Z) = I(X; Z) holds in case that the knowledge of one variable is sufficient to predicted the other one exactly. Mutual Information is again measured in nats as in (4). It is important to recall here that mutual information is a nonlinear dependence metric, i.e., it is capable of detecting dependence between random variables which are not induced by a linear relationship.…”
Section: Information Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example several studies have relied on the concept of entropy as an indicator of uncertainty within risk assessment procedures [23,1] or to set up optimal experimental design for model discrimination [17]. IT mutual information has also been shown to be an indicator of the degree of nonlinearity existing between output variables in flow and transport simulations, with a particular focus on their spatial correlation [4]. As an alternative approach, the concept of entrogram was introduced in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Characterization of permeability of porous media plays a major role in a variety of hydrological settings. There are abundant studies documenting that permeability values and their associated statistics depend on a variety of scales, i.e., the measurement support (or data support), the sampling window (domain of investigation), the spatial correlation (degree of structural coherence) and the spatial resolution (rendering the degree of the descriptive detail associated with the characterization of a porous system) (see, e.g., Brace, 1984;Clauser, 1992;Neuman, 1994;Schad and Teutsch, 1994;Rovey and Cherkauer, 1995;Sanchez-Villa et al, 1996;Schulze-Makuch and Cherkauer, 1998;Schulze-Makuch et al, 1999;Wilson, 1999a, b, 2000;Vesselinov et al, 2001a, b;Winter and Tartakovsky, 2001;Hyun et al, 2002;Neuman and Di Federico, 2003;Maréchal et al, 2004;Illman, 2004;Cintoli et al, 2005;Riva et al, 2013;Guadagnini et al, 2013Guadagnini et al, , 2018, and references therein). Among these scales, we focus here on the characteristic length associated with data collection (i.e., support scale).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaying on IT metrics, Butera et al (2018) assess the relevance of non-linear effects for the characterization of the spatial dependence of flow and solute transport related observables. Pedretti (2017, 2018) develope novel concepts, mutuated by IT, for the characterization of heterogeneity within a porous system and its links to salient solute transport features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%