2005
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2005.850240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual injection locking: a new architecture for high-power solid-state laser arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the derivation in Appendix B, it can be found that (31) and (32) are not independent because (32) (or (31)) can be obtained with (30) and (31) (or (32)). Furthermore, it can be also seen that (18) is equivalent to (30) or (19) and (31) is indispensable to make (31) and (32) satisfied (see Appendix B). Till now, we get the sufficient conditions for phase locking of the array of mutually-injected lasers, i.e., (29)- (31).…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From the derivation in Appendix B, it can be found that (31) and (32) are not independent because (32) (or (31)) can be obtained with (30) and (31) (or (32)). Furthermore, it can be also seen that (18) is equivalent to (30) or (19) and (31) is indispensable to make (31) and (32) satisfied (see Appendix B). Till now, we get the sufficient conditions for phase locking of the array of mutually-injected lasers, i.e., (29)- (31).…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it can be also seen that (18) is equivalent to (30) or (19) and (31) is indispensable to make (31) and (32) satisfied (see Appendix B). Till now, we get the sufficient conditions for phase locking of the array of mutually-injected lasers, i.e., (29)- (31). It means that, corresponding an N-laser array with S×S couplers, there should be [N+(S−1) N/2+M'] independent conditions to be satisfied to realize phase locking of the array (M' is the amount of the independent conditions given in (31) or (32)).…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the output laser is linear-polarization, measuring by the Glan-Taylor prism. Considered the wavelength matching between the seed laser and the power laser which is centered on 2.013 lm under free oscillating, that can improve the ratio of frequency locked significantly [10], the 0.1 mm F-P was tuned from the angle of 56.4°to 50.4°. Under this condition, the output wavelength is turned to 2.013 lm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Output Wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%