2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual seismic assessment and isolation of different art objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wake of the above-mentioned previous studies by the authors concerning the seismic retrofit of irregular structures by means of base isolation [5][6][7][8][9], DCSS devices are adopted for the intervention on the case study building. Indeed, for this type of sliders, the response of the isolation system results to be independent of the characteristics of the superstructure [5,[24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Base Isolation Retrofit Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the wake of the above-mentioned previous studies by the authors concerning the seismic retrofit of irregular structures by means of base isolation [5][6][7][8][9], DCSS devices are adopted for the intervention on the case study building. Indeed, for this type of sliders, the response of the isolation system results to be independent of the characteristics of the superstructure [5,[24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Base Isolation Retrofit Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to substantially improve the seismic performance of the structure without altering its architectural appearance, a base isolation retrofit hypothesis is developed here, as a preliminary study to a possible application on the building to be carried out in the near future. Due to the irregularities in plan and along the height of the building, double concave sliding surface (DCSS) devices are selected for the isolation system, which are similar to the ones adopted in previous retrofit studies carried out by the authors on ordinary R/C buildings [5][6][7][8], as well as in the design of new R/C ones [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element analyses with newly proposed constitutive laws and parameters were implemented to validate the efficiency of this strategy. After two years, Sorace et al [26] placed the same double-friction pendulum bearings at the base of the bearing floor where a semicircular marble column and an equestrian bronze sculpture are located. This strategy precludes any modification of foundations and pedestals of the objects, as well as easily moving them in case of future relocations, which significantly cuts the cost of the interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorace and Terenzi (2015) and Sorace et al. (2016) focused on museums with floor isolation systems. The double‐friction pendulum isolators were used for the base‐isolated floor, whereas the museum contents were modeled with a finite element approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former case, the base isolation was applied to the building, whereas in the latter, the base isolation was implemented on the base of the statue. Sorace and Terenzi (2015) and Sorace et al (2016) focused on museums with floor isolation systems. The doublefriction pendulum isolators were used for the base-isolated floor, whereas the museum contents were modeled with a finite element approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%