Mutualism between antagonists: its ecological and evolutionary implications

Abstract

Mutualism or antagonism between species is often investigated within the framework of monotonic interactions of either mutualism or antagonism, but studies on transition from mutualism to antagonism (within the context of nonmonotonic interactions) have been largely ignored. In this paper, through a brief review and synthesis, we highlighted the role of mutualism between antagonists in regulating the ecological and evolutionary processes, as well as maintaining the stability and complexity of ecosystems. Mutualism between antagonistic species represents the density‐dependent transition between mutualism and antagonism, which is beneficial to species coexistence and stability of complex ecosystems; thus, it should be favored by natural selection. Species may face selection of conflicting pressure on functional traits in co‐balancing mutualism and antagonism, which may result in evolution of the dual character of species with moderate mutualistic or antagonistic traits. Coevolution and co‐balance of these traits are driving forces in shaping mutualism–antagonism systems. Rewards for mutualists, punishment for exploiters, and competition of meta‐communities are essential in stabilizing mutualism between antagonists. We appeal for more studies on mutualism between antagonists and its ecological and evolutionary implications by expanding the conventional ecological studies from monotonic to nonmonotonic regimes.

A rodent herbivore reduces its predation risk through ecosystem engineering

“…The complex vole-shrike interaction mediated by bunchgrasses provides empirical evidence that the transition between positive to negative effect of prey on predator would produce multiple stable equilibria that increase community diversity and stability. [29][30][31] This finding suggests that planting bunchgrasses would help to reduce damage of overabundant vole to pastureland.…”

Ectoparasitic fungi of Myrmica ants alter the success of parasitic butterflies

“…Theoretical models 1,2,7 , greenhouse and laboratory experiments 3,5 , and examples from biological control 4,6 suggest that synergistic or additive virulence effects are most likely 58,59 , so the possibility of a conditional 60 antagonistic effect, as outlined above, is intriguing. Such effects are likely to be more common than hitherto documented 61 ; for example, such a conditional effect has recently been proposed for a microsporidian parasite of Daphnia 62 . There is no evidence for direct interaction between the two parasites in our study.…”

The Role Transition of Dietary Species Richness in Modulating the Gut Microbial Assembly and Postweaning Performance of a Generalist Herbivore

“…Nonmonotonic interactions are largely responsible for the complexity of ecological processes, with transitions among positive, negative, and neutral effects that have received much attention by theoretical and field ecologists ( 40 – 42 ). The nonlinear effect of DSR on the performance components of Brandt’s vole may be due to the nonadditive interactions of diet items consumed in a mixture.…”