2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

90
2,797
4
32

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,288 publications
(2,923 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
90
2,797
4
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the number of MYB domain, the MYB family can be divided into four classes, 1R-, R2R3-, 3R-and 4R-MYB proteins (Dubos et al 2010;Stracke et al 2001). R2R3-MYB proteins are specific to plants and are also the most abundant type in plants, with more than 100 R2R3-MYB members in the genomes of dicots and monocots (Jiang et al 2004a;Wilkins et al 2009).…”
Section: Structure Of Mybmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the number of MYB domain, the MYB family can be divided into four classes, 1R-, R2R3-, 3R-and 4R-MYB proteins (Dubos et al 2010;Stracke et al 2001). R2R3-MYB proteins are specific to plants and are also the most abundant type in plants, with more than 100 R2R3-MYB members in the genomes of dicots and monocots (Jiang et al 2004a;Wilkins et al 2009).…”
Section: Structure Of Mybmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MYB genes were generated by successive gain of repeat units. Du et al (2009) and Dubos et al (2010) have reviewed the structure, characteristic, classification, multi-functionality, mechanism of combinational control, the "gain" model for evolution and function redundancy of MYB genes in detail.…”
Section: Evolution Of Mybmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This plant-specific TF family is defined by a common DNA-binding domain of two repeats of about 50 amino acids. Examination of R2R3MYB TFs by phylogenetic analysis has revealed functionally distinct subgroups (Stracke et al, 2001;Jiang et al, 2004;Dubos et al, 2010), of which several are involved in the regulation of particular branches of phenylpropanoid metabolism; for example, anthocyanin production (PazAres et al, 1987;Quattrocchio et al, 1998;Schwinn et al, 2006), phlobaphene biosynthesis (Grotewold et al, 1994), flavonol biosynthesis (Mehrtens et al, 2005), hydroxycinnamic acid biosynthesis (Tamagnone et al, 1998;Jin et al, 2000), and monolignol biosynthesis (Zhou et al, 2009;Zhong et al, 2010). In legumes, there is an extra dimension to the regulatory control of phenylpropanoid metabolism because they produce isoflavonoids that serve as phytoalexins and as signaling molecules for nodulation (Subramanian et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven members of the proposed GRN are part of the WRKY TF family: WRKY6, WRKY15, WRKY28, WRKY30, WRKY33, WRKY40, and WRKY48, which contain a conserved sequence (WRKYGQK) followed by a zinc finger motif, enabling the binding to DNA at the position of a W‐box TTGAC(C/T) (Wu et al , 2005). Finally, three other TFs, ZAT6 and STZ, belonging to the Zinc Finger TF family (Englbrecht et al , 2004; Ciftci‐Yilmaz & Mittler, 2008; Kiełbowicz‐Matuk, 2012), and MYB51 (Stracke et al , 2001; Dubos et al , 2010), are part of the proposed mannitol‐inducible network (Appendix Table S1). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%