Soil was percolated with water and various nutrient solutions, and then the percolates were analyzed for bacteriophages which produced plaques on various Arthrobacter strains. The water percolates did not contain detectable phage. In contrast, phages for A. globiformis strains ATCC 8010 and 4336, and for several recent Arthrobacter species soil isolates, were easily detected in nutrient broth, soil extract, and cation-complete medium percolates. These percolates did not contain phage that produced plaques on A. oxydans and a recent Arthrobacter species soil isolate. Percolation with a selective nicotine-salts solution was required for demonstrating phage for these bacteria. None of the percolates contained phage for five additional named Arthrobacter species. In addition, phages were not detected for A. crystallopoietes in a 2-hydroxypyridine percolate of soil. Based on their lytic spectra, the phage isolates from this soil were relatively host specific. Arthrobacter species are pleomorphic bacteria found in soil (7, 8, 10, 16) and other natural habitats (20). Although the ecology of Arthrobacter species has been the subject of much study, relatively little is known concerning the interaction of these bacteria with bacteriophage and other predators in nature. Phage for various Arthrobacter species have been isolated and partially characterized (3, 5, 11, 14, 17, 19). In addition, the use of phage to type soil Arthrobacter species has been investigated (3, 9). The techniques available for phage isolation from soil have not worked well for Arthrobacter phage. To remedy this situation, Casida and Liu (5) developed a unique soil enrichment technique that did not involve addition of potential host cells to the soil. This technique allowed the isolation of a variety of phages for A. globiformis. However, these workers did not try to use their technique for isolating phages for other Arthrobacter species. Brown et al. (3) were not successful in isolating Arthrobacter phages from river water and sewage. They did, however, find small numbers of phage when they concentrated their preparations. There were phage for several Arthrobacter soil isolates in the concentrates, but none that were active against the named Arthrobacter species tested. The phages from the concentrates showed some cross-reactions among the host Arthrobacter soil isolates. These authors did not use the Casida and Liu procedure. As a result, they were unable to detect Arthrobacter phage in either unconcentrated or t Paper no. 6148 in the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agriculture Experiment Station.