2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13199-018-0571-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal dicotyledonous herbaceous plants differ in root anatomy: evidence from the Middle Urals, Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integral indicators have been used to isolate these syndromes: SRL, RTD, root diameter, cortical fraction ( Bergmann et al., 2020 ). Apparently, syndromes are more difficult to identify when it comes to the analysis of anatomical features, where the roots of plants belonging to the same group (AM) may have diverse morphotypes that cannot be attributed to one group ( Betekhtina and Veselkin, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Integral indicators have been used to isolate these syndromes: SRL, RTD, root diameter, cortical fraction ( Bergmann et al., 2020 ). Apparently, syndromes are more difficult to identify when it comes to the analysis of anatomical features, where the roots of plants belonging to the same group (AM) may have diverse morphotypes that cannot be attributed to one group ( Betekhtina and Veselkin, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In monocots, compared to dicots ( Betekhtina and Veselkin, 2019 ), the overall variability of some root characteristics is high. For example, in herbaceous dicots, root system branching varies from 3 to 5 orders ( Betekhtina and Veselkin, 2019 ), whereas in monocots within the present study – from 1 to 4 orders. In dicots, the thickness of first-order roots varied between families by no more than two times, and in monocots, up to 15–20 times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations