2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-013-9931-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycorrhizal associations of dominant trees influence nitrate leaching responses to N deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…as soil carbon storage (34), nitrogen leaching (35), and phosphorus cycling (36). Here, we provide additional evidence that the relative dominance of AM or EM trees in a forest, as well as their root traits, may partly determine the response pathways (roots vs. hyphae) to fine-scale spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…as soil carbon storage (34), nitrogen leaching (35), and phosphorus cycling (36). Here, we provide additional evidence that the relative dominance of AM or EM trees in a forest, as well as their root traits, may partly determine the response pathways (roots vs. hyphae) to fine-scale spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The previous meta‐analysis was consistent with our results with ECM forests having higher average soil C/N ratios than AM forests (Averill et al, ; Lin et al, ). AM forests with lower soil C/N ratios tend to dominate in warm and wet habitats (Table ), where nitrogen mineralization and nitrification processes are rapid (Midgley & Phillips, ). Increased soil C/N ratios indicate nitrogen limitation of decomposer activity and, thus, low mineralization rates, which can explain subsequent accumulation of larger amounts of fine root necromass (Leuschner et al, ) and lower fine root B/N ratios in AM forest as shown in the present study (Figure a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, ECM trees generally have more slowly decomposing leaf litter (Cornelissen et al, 2001;Hobbie et al, 2006), and a greater proportion of nutrients in organic forms that are re-acquired by plants via ectomycorrhizal mycelium that produce extracellular enzyme to mine nutrients from SOM. A consequence of these dynamics is that ECM-dominated forests tend to cycle C and nutrients more conservatively than AM-dominated forests, and contribute to differential rates of soil C retention (Vesterdal et al, 2012;Averill et al, 2014) and N leaching losses (Midgley and Phillips, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%