Microbes for Legume Improvement 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-99753-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycorrhizosphere Interactions for Legume Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such biological interventions are becoming more attractive as the use of chemicals for fumigation and disease control is progressively discouraged and fertilizers have become more and more expensive (Atkinson, 2009). Sustainable systems seek to maximize the beneficial effects of the natural soil microbiota, in general, however, there is a particular emphasis on AM fungi, phosphate-solubilising microorganisms and N 2 -fixing rhizobial bacteria (Gianinazzi et al, 2010;Azcón and Barea, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such biological interventions are becoming more attractive as the use of chemicals for fumigation and disease control is progressively discouraged and fertilizers have become more and more expensive (Atkinson, 2009). Sustainable systems seek to maximize the beneficial effects of the natural soil microbiota, in general, however, there is a particular emphasis on AM fungi, phosphate-solubilising microorganisms and N 2 -fixing rhizobial bacteria (Gianinazzi et al, 2010;Azcón and Barea, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from several isotopic-labeling experiments using different plant species (mainly legumes) have shown increased biomass and P content of plants coinoculated with AM and PSB, along with lower SA of shoot tissues compared with non-inoculated or singularly-inoculated plants (Azcón and Barea 2010). This suggests that PSB are effective in releasing orthophosphate anions from soil or RP sources and, that in the presence of AM fungi, the P is more available for plant uptake ( Fig.…”
Section: Biological and Ecological Basis Of Mycorrhizosphere Interactmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Collectively, plants inoculated with both AM fungi and PSM therefore appear to be more P efficient compared to those that were non-inoculated or singly-inoculated. In conclusion this demonstrates that opportunity exists to gain benefit in plant P nutrition from interactive effects of PSB and AM-fungi through tailored management of the mycorrhizosphere (Azcón and Barea 2010).…”
Section: Biological and Ecological Basis Of Mycorrhizosphere Interactmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The lowest of yield (198.4 g m ) was obtained in W 2 F 0 Zn 0 (Table 7). Azcon and Barea (2010) have been proposed co-inoculation PGPR and AM fungi as an efficient procedure to increase yield and plant growth. Vivas et al (2003) suggested that there are synergistic effects on plant growth when bacteria (PGPR) and AM fungi are inoculated, particularly under growth-limited conditions.…”
Section: Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%