“… 25 Since then, several other reports have been published. 1 , 3 , 6 , 8 , 12 , 15 , 21 , 23 This strategy is less invasive because it avoids dissections in an anatomy compromised by infection and the aorta is not clamped, which in theory benefits patients with a high surgical risk. 1 , 7 , 11 However, implantation of endoprostheses in infected tissues increases the incidence of complications, including endoprosthesis infection, 1 , 6 , 9 , 23 and also of malpositioning and consequent endoleaks with the potential for aneurysm rupture.…”