2019
DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myeloid Neoplasm With Eosinophilia and FIP1L1-PDGFRA Rearrangement Treated With Imatinib Mesylate: A Pediatric Case With Long-term Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was identified, the diagnosis was modified to FIP1L1-PDGFRApositive CEL and the authors declared the intent of initiation of imatinib if their patient exhibits a second relapse (4). All subsequent reported pediatric cases included imatinib in their treatment plan (5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Favorable outcomes were reported in all cases except the case presenting as T-LBL that was reported by Oberley et al in 2017 (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was identified, the diagnosis was modified to FIP1L1-PDGFRApositive CEL and the authors declared the intent of initiation of imatinib if their patient exhibits a second relapse (4). All subsequent reported pediatric cases included imatinib in their treatment plan (5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Favorable outcomes were reported in all cases except the case presenting as T-LBL that was reported by Oberley et al in 2017 (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discontinuation of imatinib has been associated with relapse in FIP1L1/PDGFRA -positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia in both adult and pediatric cases ( 6 , 17 , 18 ). Although few authors reported maintained remission after decreasing imatinib maintenance dose, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal maintenance duration ( 11 , 12 ). It is advised that patients remain on regular follow-up by molecular monitoring to dictate optimal duration of continuation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most FGs with pathological significance, even if the positive rate of one single FG is relatively low, it still has definite significance in clinical diagnosis, treatment guidance, and MRD monitoring. 15,16 Thus, the detection of these rare FGs is also clinically significant. For example, FIP1L1-PDGFRA is rare in hematological malignancies; however, the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion protein is 100 times more sensitive than BCR-ABL1 to imatinib.…”
Section: Traditional Methods and Limitations Of Fgs Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, FIP1L1-PDGFRA is rare in hematological malignancies; however, the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion protein is 100 times more sensitive than BCR-ABL1 to imatinib. 4,15 Even in the routine detection of FGs that are already well known, false negative results may occur because of variant fusion transcripts, such as BCR-ABL1 and their variant and rare isotypes. 17,18 Therefore, how to effectively identify rare and variant FGs poses great challenges for detection methods and data analysis.…”
Section: Traditional Methods and Limitations Of Fgs Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This disease is extremely uncommon in children and only 8 FIP1L1-PDGRFA cases have previously been described. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] A rare presentation of this entity, only previously reported in adults, is blast phase disease with >20% blasts in the peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM), and/or as extramedullary disease. 1,10,11 Such a presentation is often difficult to distinguish from AML, and is typically accompanied with massive splenomegaly and peripheral eosinophilia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%