2002
DOI: 10.1118/1.1473135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model‐independent deconvolution

Abstract: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during the first pass of an injected contrast agent has been used to assess myocardial perfusion, but the quantification of blood flow has been generally judged as too complex for its clinical application. This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying model-independent deconvolution to the measured tissue residue curves to quantify myocardial perfusion. Model-independent approaches only require minimal user interaction or expertise in modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
240
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
240
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative perfusion analysis was performed as previously described9; briefly, MBF was determined independently at baseline and under adenosine stress by model‐independent deconvolution of signal intensity curves with an arterial input function measured in the LV blood pool, with explicit accounting for any delay in the arrival of the tracer. Fitting quality of MBF was assessed in a blinded fashion for each myocardial segment; MBF values derived from segments with good fitting were averaged to derive a global per‐subject MBF value, which was used for all analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative perfusion analysis was performed as previously described9; briefly, MBF was determined independently at baseline and under adenosine stress by model‐independent deconvolution of signal intensity curves with an arterial input function measured in the LV blood pool, with explicit accounting for any delay in the arrival of the tracer. Fitting quality of MBF was assessed in a blinded fashion for each myocardial segment; MBF values derived from segments with good fitting were averaged to derive a global per‐subject MBF value, which was used for all analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a validated, noninvasive, and accurate method for detecting myocardial hypoperfusion8 and can also quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) 9. We hypothesized that CMR would demonstrate microcirculatory dysfunction and impaired myocardial perfusion in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who have no significant epicardial coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus and that these findings would relate to both left atrial (LA) dysfunction and the reduction in left ventricular (LV) function that is present even when the ventricular rate is well controlled 10, 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models have been proposed, and the first-order difference operator (L 1 , a bidiagonal matrix (see Eq. [7] below)) is commonly used to reduce the oscillations in r (14,15). After an initial comparison between the solutions obtained with different-order difference operators (L i ) for the R lor (t) model (note that since the derivatives of an exponential function are proportional to the function, all of the L i matrices give similar results for the R exp (t) model), the first-order difference operator L 1 was chosen because it produced the closest solution to the simulated model (data not shown).…”
Section: Tikhonov Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the commonly used SVD approach introduced by Østergaard et al (8) corresponds to the regularization method known as truncated SVD (TSVD) (14). Different regularization methods have been used, with various degrees of success, for the quantification of CBF (8,10), and myocardial blood flow (15). The present work describes the implementation of Tikhonov regularization with the L-curve criterion (14) to quantify CBF and obtain a better characterization of R(t).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models, such as the B-splines in Ref. 15, could possibly be used instead. The basic form of the two-compartment model is given by …”
Section: Model-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%