2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2828(02)90978-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial dysfunction with coronary microembolization: Signal transduction through a sequence of no, TNFα and sphingosine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
90
1
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
90
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this study suggests that the previously reported microembolization-induced contractile dysfunction (23,34) may be related, at least in part, to myocardial edema resulting from increased permeability, as demonstrated by increased diastolic wall thickness and increased volume of myocardium within the LAD perfusion territory (Fig. 4A).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, this study suggests that the previously reported microembolization-induced contractile dysfunction (23,34) may be related, at least in part, to myocardial edema resulting from increased permeability, as demonstrated by increased diastolic wall thickness and increased volume of myocardium within the LAD perfusion territory (Fig. 4A).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Inflammatory mediators such as TNF-␣, free oxygen radicals, and interleukins have been shown to play a major role in contractile dysfunction in the microembolized myocardium following coronary microembolization (15,17,34), possibly indicating the role of inflammation and/or edema in its pathogenesis. Such mediators can likely more easily diffuse into the perfused myocardium from the interfacial region between perfused and nonperfused myocardium (i.e., proportional to the interface's surface area) rather than from deep within the nonperfused myocardium, which would make the effect more proportional to the volume of nonperfused myocardium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In subsequent studies, a causal role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-␣ and sphingosine in this progressive contractile dysfunction was demonstrated. 6,7 These experiments were limited to a time frame of 8 hours, and it remained unclear whether the progressive contractile dysfunction eventually recovers. We have therefore now monitored the time course of the progressive contractile dysfunction until full recovery in chronically instrumented conscious dogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emboli that were collected by distal protection devices during PCI differed widely in size, ranging from 47 to 2504 m. 28 As evidenced by experimental studies, microembolization from a fissuring/rupturing atherosclerotic plaque in an epicardial coronary artery caused not only physical obstruction of the downstream microcirculation but also a marked inflammatory response in the affected myocardium. 5,6,8 Elevated levels of hsCRP as a marker of inflammation strongly predicted early complications (30-day risk of death or MI) after stent deployment in patients with coronary artery disease, and the risk associated with elevated CRP was independent of but additive to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion score. 7,29 In the present study, 30 patients did not show a postprocedural cTnI elevation, although 8 of these 30 had Ͼ20 microemboli during PCI.…”
Section: Microembolization and Cardiac Biomarker Elevationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Experimentally, a progressive contractile dysfunction developed in response to coronary microembolization over a period of hours; it was not associated with reduced regional myocardial blood flow (perfusion-contraction mismatch) but rather with a local inflammatory reaction. 5,6 Reminiscent of these experimental studies, elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a marker of systemic inflammation provide prognostic information for patients undergoing PCI. 7 The source of C-reactive protein (CRP) was traditionally assumed to be the atherosclerotic plaque, but it equally well may be derived from the microcirculatory inflammation in response to microembolization and associated microinfarcts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%