IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2003.1293371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial elastography - comparison to results using MR cardiac tagging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, their estimated systolic strains were defined as the percent change of the segment length, while the actual Lagrangian normal strain component includes the second order of the shear components. Konofagou et al (2003) showed that axial displacement (r=0.81) and strain (r=0.65) estimated from B-mode based myocardial elastography were well correlated with those from 1D MR tagging in the septum in an apical four-chamber view of human left ventricles. Only the axial estimates, which coincided with the beam direction and were displayed in an M-mode format, were shown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, their estimated systolic strains were defined as the percent change of the segment length, while the actual Lagrangian normal strain component includes the second order of the shear components. Konofagou et al (2003) showed that axial displacement (r=0.81) and strain (r=0.65) estimated from B-mode based myocardial elastography were well correlated with those from 1D MR tagging in the septum in an apical four-chamber view of human left ventricles. Only the axial estimates, which coincided with the beam direction and were displayed in an M-mode format, were shown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Several previous studies have compared the estimates from echocardiography with those from tMRI (Edvardsen et al 2002, Konofagou et al 2003, Helle-Valle et al 2005, Notomi et al 2005, Amundsen et al 2006). Edvardsen et al (2002) first validated echocardiographic strains using Tissue Doppler against MRI tagging and showed high correlation for radial strains (r=0.96) between the two modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study employed envelope-detected (B-mode) data to estimate the axial displacements and hence has lower precision and resolution compared to the use of RF signals. Another comparison study also indicated that myocardial elastography could offer comparable quality estimates to those obtained with MR cardiac tagging; with the added advantage of higher temporal and spatial resolution [10]. In addition to axial displacements and strains, myocardial elastography can obtain lateral displacements and strains [6], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%