2024
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Unraveling Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Emerging Prevention Strategies

Marios Sagris,
Anastasios Apostolos,
Panagiotis Theofilis
et al.

Abstract: Myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury (MIRI) remains a challenge in the context of reperfusion procedures for myocardial infarction (MI). While early revascularization stands as the gold standard for mitigating myocardial injury, recent insights have illuminated the paradoxical role of reperfusion, giving rise to the phenomenon known as ischemia–reperfusion injury. This comprehensive review delves into the intricate pathophysiological pathways involved in MIRI, placing a particular focus on the pivotal role o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 126 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thrombolytic therapy or direct percutaneous coronary intervention in time after the occurrence of MI, followed by the use of lipid-lowering drugs and anti-coagulants, are the most effective treatment interventions for patients with MI, which can significantly reduce myocardial infarction size and mortality [ 2 , 3 ]. Percutaneous coronary intervention can restore the blood flow of the infarcted coronary artery, but it is prone to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, including further tissue damage and myocardial cell apoptosis, which will eventually lead to the development of heart failure and other poor prognosis [ 4 , 5 ]. In addition, the body will undergo some pathological changes after MI, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial dysfunction, calcium overload, and other mechanisms that induce cell death and inflammatory response [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrombolytic therapy or direct percutaneous coronary intervention in time after the occurrence of MI, followed by the use of lipid-lowering drugs and anti-coagulants, are the most effective treatment interventions for patients with MI, which can significantly reduce myocardial infarction size and mortality [ 2 , 3 ]. Percutaneous coronary intervention can restore the blood flow of the infarcted coronary artery, but it is prone to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, including further tissue damage and myocardial cell apoptosis, which will eventually lead to the development of heart failure and other poor prognosis [ 4 , 5 ]. In addition, the body will undergo some pathological changes after MI, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial dysfunction, calcium overload, and other mechanisms that induce cell death and inflammatory response [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%