2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01717-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial perfusion artifacts in left bundle branch block: A diagnostic challenge

Abstract: Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.' Journal of Nuclear CardiologyÒ Gupta et al Myocardial perfusion artifacts in left bundle branch block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a frequent source of false positive reports in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). This has been reported in previous studies that have evaluated the relation between myocardial perfusion and LBBB [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a frequent source of false positive reports in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). This has been reported in previous studies that have evaluated the relation between myocardial perfusion and LBBB [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In an editorial by Gupta et al in this Journal in 2019 on myocardial perfusion artifacts in LBBB, 16 the following four research questions were raised that merited further investigation: The effort of Dr Vidula and colleagues is laudable but incomplete when taken into consideration the abovementioned research questions. Based on the present study I would add the following questions for future research studies:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is well established that measures of LVAS are influenced by LV function, volume, scar burden and conduction abnormalities, [16][17][18] which also influence indices of myocardial perfusion. 19,20 The effect of these confounders on the relationship between LVAS and myocardial perfusion indices needs to be excluded to clearly elucidate the relationship between LVAS and subclinical flow heterogeneity. Additional clarity will be needed on the clinical application of LVAS for diagnosis of CAD-overt or subclinical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%