1996
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.9.2193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial Protection by Brief Ischemia in Noncardiac Tissue

Abstract: Brief ischemia in "remote" organs protects myocardium against infarction as effectively as myocardial preconditioning. The mechanism of protection by MAO differs from that of CAO, because ganglion blockade abolished protection by MAO but not by CAO. The neurogenic pathway is activated during reperfusion after 15-minute MAO, because sustained MAO failed to produce cardioprotection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
473
1
17

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(497 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
473
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Neuronal and Humoral Pathways Involvement of neuronal pathways is mostly based on the finding that blockade of the autonomic ganglion reversed the cardioprotective effects of rIPC when the preconditioning ischemic insult is performed via mesenteric artery occlusion. 19 This concept appears to also apply to the rIPC-associated neuroprotection in cerebral tissue, as was recently demonstrated. 20 In addition, adenosine receptors, particularly the subtype A1, have been implicated as the mediators of neuroprotection in rIPC, likely through increased production of specific antioxidants and NO.…”
Section: Signal Transduction Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…18 Neuronal and Humoral Pathways Involvement of neuronal pathways is mostly based on the finding that blockade of the autonomic ganglion reversed the cardioprotective effects of rIPC when the preconditioning ischemic insult is performed via mesenteric artery occlusion. 19 This concept appears to also apply to the rIPC-associated neuroprotection in cerebral tissue, as was recently demonstrated. 20 In addition, adenosine receptors, particularly the subtype A1, have been implicated as the mediators of neuroprotection in rIPC, likely through increased production of specific antioxidants and NO.…”
Section: Signal Transduction Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, the discovery that an IPC stimulus applied to the circumflex coronary artery reduced the size of an MI arising from sustained occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (6) was subsequently extended by the demonstration that the heart could be protected by subjecting a remote organ or tissue, such as kidney, small intestine, liver, or limb, to short episodes of IR, a phenomenon known as remote IPC (7)(8)(9)(10). Application of a tourniquet to the hind limb before prolonged cardiac IR reduced arrhythmias in rats and IS in pigs (9,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Apart from the local effects, the protection of remote tissues can also be achieved through brief periods of arterial occlusions of the intestine, kidneys, and many other organs. 2,3 Although the remote effects of intraabdominal IPC may be notable, the extremities provide better opportunities for clinical purposes. IPC of the limbs in humans can be easily performed, the risk of surgical complications is low, and moreover, the large tissue mass may theoretically provide strong defense-triggering IPC signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%