2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial Scar Identified by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Left Ventricular Functional Improvement after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Abstract: BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that viable myocardium predicts recovery of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after revascularization. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial scar assessed by late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) on functional recovery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsFrom November 2009 to September 2012, 63 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) referred for first-time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of segmental wall‐motion abnormalities was a negative predictor of LVR. Scarring, fibrosis, and infarcted myocardium, as identified by various imaging modalities, have consistently shown to be negative predictors of functional recovery …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of segmental wall‐motion abnormalities was a negative predictor of LVR. Scarring, fibrosis, and infarcted myocardium, as identified by various imaging modalities, have consistently shown to be negative predictors of functional recovery …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the extent of myocardial scarring was lower in the patients who presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with VF than in those who presented with sustained monomorphic VT. Myocardial scarring is reportedly associated with functional nonrecovery from various conditions occurring after pharmacological or surgical treatments. [24][25][26] One plausible mechanism to explain why the HFrEF patients in our present population with an initial VF presentation were associated with late LVEF improvement was the presence of the lower extent of myocardial scarring. However, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was not systemically performed in our present study patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Yang demonstrated an absolute LVEF improvement of ≥5% in 32 of 52 (62%) patients with depressed LVEF after CABG, though only 58% of these patients had initial LVEF <35%. 11 Conflicting information in a similar population of patients with a depressed LVEF showed ''clinically significant'' LVEF improvement (again defined as a ≥5% increase) in only 39% of patients, and an average absolute improvement of only 3% (baseline 29 ± 7%, 32 ± 9% post-revascularization). 12 Of note, all these previously published data regarding LVEF response to revascularization refer to patients undergoing surgical revascularization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%