2019
DOI: 10.22175/mmb.10818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myoglobin Modeling to Study Species-Specific Differences in the Distance Between Heme Iron and Proximal and Distal Histidines

Abstract: ObjectivesSpecies-specific differences in amino acid sequence influence myoglobin redox properties. Previous studies reported that the number and location of histidine residues can influence myoglobin redox stability. However, limited knowledge is currently available on the species-specific differences in the distances between the proximal (His 93) and distal (His 64) histidines and the heme iron in myoglobin. The objective of the current research was to utilize homology-based modeling to determine the distanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrochemistry approaches indicated no differences in the ability of heme to accept an electron between bovine and porcine myoglobins (i.e., no differences in reduction potential) . However, differences in reduction potential of myoglobin heme did appear among eight different species (bison = deer = emu = goat = equine = sheep > pork = bovine; P < 0.05) . Although the mechanistic basis was not clear, the primary structure of myoglobin may influence heme’s ability to accept an electron.…”
Section: Myoglobin Redox Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electrochemistry approaches indicated no differences in the ability of heme to accept an electron between bovine and porcine myoglobins (i.e., no differences in reduction potential) . However, differences in reduction potential of myoglobin heme did appear among eight different species (bison = deer = emu = goat = equine = sheep > pork = bovine; P < 0.05) . Although the mechanistic basis was not clear, the primary structure of myoglobin may influence heme’s ability to accept an electron.…”
Section: Myoglobin Redox Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…24 However, differences in reduction potential of myoglobin heme did appear among eight different species (bison = deer = emu = goat = equine = sheep > pork = bovine; P < 0.05). 25 Although the mechanistic basis was not clear, the primary structure of myoglobin may influence heme's ability to accept an electron. Nonenzymatic reduction in a solution using an electron carrier and donor indicated bovine myoglobin has greater reduction potential than porcine myoglobin.…”
Section: ■ Myoglobin Redox Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%