Myopia in Bulgarian school children: prevalence, risk factors, and health care coverage

Abstract

Background The prevalence of myopia has increased in recent years, with changes being dynamic and uneven in different regions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of visual impairment caused by myopia in Bulgarian school children, associated risk factors, and health care coverage. Methods A cross-sectional study among 1401 children (mean age 10.38, standard deviation 2.70) is conducted in three locations in Bulgaria from 2016 to 2020. Refractive error is measured with an auto-refractor in the absence of cycloplegia, the visual acuity is assessed without refractive error correction. A paper-based preliminary questionnaire is used to collect data on previous eye examinations, prescribed optical vision correction, regularity of wearing corrective glasses and risk factors. Results Children with myopic objective refraction ≤ -0.75 D and decimal visual acuity ≤ 0.8 on at least one of the eyes are 236 out of 1401 or 16.85%. The prevalence of myopia varies depending on age, geographical location, and school profile. The rate of myopic children in age group 6–10 is 14.2% compared to 19.9% in age group 11–15. The prevalence of myopic children in the urban populations is 31.4% (capital) and 19.9% (medium-sized town) respectively, and only 8.4% in the rural population. Our results show 53% increase of the prevalence of myopia in the age group 11–15 compared to a 2009 report. The analysis of data associated with health care coverage factors of all myopic pupils shows that 71.6% had a previous eye examination, 43.2% have prescription for corrective glasses, 27.5% wear their glasses regularly. Risk factors for higher odds of myopia are gender (female), age (adolescence), and parents with impaired vision. Residence in a small town and daily sport activities correspond to lower odds for myopia. The screen time (time in front of the screen calculated in hours per day) is self-reported and is not associated with increased odds of myopia when accounted for the other risk factors. Conclusions The prevalence of myopia in this study is higher compared to previous studies in Bulgaria. Additional studies would be helpful in planning adequate prevention and vision care.

Effect of Atropine Eye Drops Combined with VR-Based Binocular Visual Function Balance Training for Prevention and Control of Juvenile Myopia

“…During the holidays, the number of training sessions could be increased to three times a day, which were conducted in the morning, middle, and evening, respectively, with a total of 6 items. e following points should be noted during treatment: (1) keep training every day; (2) avoid training in a state of fatigue. Patients were reviewed monthly for visual acuity (VA) and eye position so that training regimens could be adjusted accordingly based on recovery.…”

“…Myopia, the main inducement of visual impairment and blindness, shows a growing incidence [ 1 ]. A higher risk of myopia is associated with factors such as women, teenagers, impaired eyesight of parents, less outdoor activities, and more time spent watching videos [ 2 , 3 ]. Statistics show that myopia, as a major public health issue of modernization, is expected to affect 49.8% of the global population in 2050, with a possible prevalence of up to 90% in East Asia and 20% of the cases evolving into high myopia [ 4 ].…”

Nutritional intake, environmental factors, and their impact on myopia prevalence in Korean children aged 5–12 years

“…Myopia is a complex condition influenced by numerous factors, including genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and lifestyle choices. [ 11 , 31 , 41 ]…”

Baseline metrics that may predict future myopia in young children

“…Myopia is a major public health concern precipitated by its increasing prevalence worldwide 1–7 and the associated risk of potentially blinding conditions 8–12 . Projections indicate that by the year 2050, over half of the world's population will have myopia, with 10% of those having high myopia 13 .…”