The strength of an excitatory synapse depends on both the presynaptic release probability (p r) and the abundance of functional postsynaptic AMPA receptors. How these parameters are related or balanced at a single synapse remains unknown. By taking advantage of live fluorescence imaging in cultured hippocampal neurons where individual synapses are readily resolved, we estimate p r by labeling presynaptic vesicles with a styryl dye, FM1-43, while concurrently measuring postsynaptic AMPA receptor abundance at the same synapse by immunolabeling surface GluR2. We find no appreciable correlation between pr and the level of surface synaptic GluR2 under basal condition, and blocking basal neural activity has no effect on the observed lack of correlation. However, elevating network activity drives their correlation, which accompanies a decrease in mean GluR2 level. These findings provide the direct evidence that the coordination of pre-and postsynaptic parameters of synaptic strength is not intrinsically fixed but that the balance is tuned by synaptic use at individual synapses.hippocampal culture ͉ synaptic strength ͉ FM1-43 ͉ neurotransmitter release ͉ glutamate receptor I n the classical Katz model of synaptic transmission, the weight of each synapse is determined by p r and quantal size (q), as p r ϫ q (1, 2). Because q is largely governed by postsynaptic receptors, synapses have to regulate both pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms to control the overall synaptic strength. Across a population of synapses, p r (3) and postsynaptic receptor level (4) are highly heterogeneous. Therefore, it is of fundamental importance to identify how the relationship between pre-and postsynaptic strengths at individual synapses is organized. For instance, the balance between the two could be compensative, synergistic, or random. Amongst a synapse population, compensative balance would result in relatively uniform synaptic strengths. In contrast, synergistic balance would result in a biased or skewed distribution of synaptic strengths. Thus, the manner in which preand postsynaptic strengths are balanced might influence dendritic processing and operation of neural networks.Previous studies on synaptic structure and physiology suggest for a positive correlation between p r and postsynaptic surface AMPA receptor level. For example, the number of AMPA receptors is correlated to postsynaptic density (PSD) size (5, 6), which, in turn, is matched to the presynaptic active zone length (7). Also, a larger presynaptic active zone supports a larger pool of readily releasable synaptic vesicles, resulting in higher p r (8,9). In further support of the view that p r and postsynaptic surface AMPA receptor abundance are correlated, overexpression of postsynaptic proteins such as PSD-95, Shank, or GluR2 enhances AMPA receptor clustering and increases spine size, and these postsynaptic changes are, in turn, accompanied by enhanced presynaptic release (10-12). Nevertheless, beyond these reports, no studies to date have directly addressed how p r and postsyna...