Myosin VI supports movement toward the (؊) end of actin filaments, despite sharing extensive sequence and structural homology with (؉)-end-directed myosins. A class-specific stretch of amino acids inserted between the converter domain and the lever arm was proposed to provide the structural basis of directionality reversal. Indeed, the unique insert mediates a 120°redirection of the lever arm in a crystal structure of the presumed poststroke conformation of myosin VI [Mé né trey J, Bahloul A, Wells AL, Yengo CM, Morris CA, Sweeney HL, Houdusse A (2005) Nature 435:779 -785]. However, this redirection alone is insufficient to account for the large (؊)-end-directed stroke of a monomeric myosin VI construct. The underlying motion of the myosin VI converter domain must therefore differ substantially from the power stroke of (؉)-end-directed myosins. To experimentally map out the motion of the converter domain and lever arm, we have generated a series of truncated myosin VI constructs and characterized the size and direction of the power stroke for each construct using dual-labeled gliding filament assays and optical trapping. Motors truncated near the end of the converter domain generate (؉)-end-directed motion, whereas longer constructs move toward the (؊) end. Our results directly demonstrate that the unique insert is required for directionality reversal, ruling out a large class of models in which the converter domain moves toward the (؊) end. We suggest that the lever arm rotates Ϸ180°between pre-and poststroke conformations.actin ͉ molecular motor ͉ pointed end ͉ swinging cross-bridge T he basic actomyosin motor has been embellished, altered, and reused many times through the evolution of diverse members of the myosin superfamily (1). Class VI myosins are highly specialized (Ϫ)-end-directed motors involved in a growing list of functions in animal cells, including endocytosis, cell migration, and maintenance of stereociliar membrane tension (2). Initial biophysical characterization (3-5) of myosin VI raised two important questions concerning the structural basis of its unique motor properties. First, how does the motor achieve reverse directionality? And second, how does dimeric myosin VI take long steps along actin, matching the stride of myosin V without the apparent benefit of a long lever arm?A Backward-Moving Myosin Myosin VI attracted attention as a candidate for a (Ϫ)-enddirected motor after the identification of a class-specific insert following the converter domain. In the swinging cross-bridge model of actomyosin function, the converter domain transmits motion from the myosin head to the C-terminal lever arm, generating a directed power stroke. Wells et al. (3) hypothesized that a structure inserted between the converter domain and the lever arm could redirect the stroke and lead to backward movement. The predicted reverse directionality of myosin VI was experimentally confirmed (3), but the precise mechanism of this remarkable adaptation remained unclear, including whether the unique insert was necess...