2014
DOI: 10.1037/spq0000030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mystery Motivator: A Tier 1 classroom behavioral intervention.

Abstract: This study is an examination of the effectiveness of the Mystery Motivator-an interdependent group contingency, variable-ratio, classwide intervention-as a tool for reducing disruptive classroom behavior in eight diverse general-education elementary school classrooms across seven different schools. The study was conducted using an ABAB, changing criterion design, and the effectiveness of the intervention was assessed for an 8-week period. The frequency of disruptive behavior in all classrooms decreased. Teache… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Caterpillar Game is also easy to implement and cost effective due to the use of group contingency and BSP. Both of these strartegies have been found to have strong teacher acceptability, likely because they are practical, simple to implement, and useful (Covington Smith, Lewis, & Stormont, 2011;Kowalewicz & Coffee, 2013;Wright & McCurdy, 2011). Ease of implementation is key when evaluating classroom management systems, because teacher acceptability impacts treatment use and effectiveness (Allinder & Oates, 1997;Dart et al, 2012).…”
Section: Summary and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Caterpillar Game is also easy to implement and cost effective due to the use of group contingency and BSP. Both of these strartegies have been found to have strong teacher acceptability, likely because they are practical, simple to implement, and useful (Covington Smith, Lewis, & Stormont, 2011;Kowalewicz & Coffee, 2013;Wright & McCurdy, 2011). Ease of implementation is key when evaluating classroom management systems, because teacher acceptability impacts treatment use and effectiveness (Allinder & Oates, 1997;Dart et al, 2012).…”
Section: Summary and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MM adds an element of intrigue to the reinforcement contingencies. The efficacy of MMs has been demonstrated in a number of studies with various populations, including students diagnosed with emotional disturbance (Kehle, Bray, Theodore, Jenson, & Clark, 2000;Theodore, Bray, & Kehle, 2004), Head Start preschoolers (Murphy, Theodore, Aloiso, Alric-Edwards, & Hughes, 2007), elementary school students (Kelshaw-Levering, Sterling-Turner, Henry, & Skinner, 2000;Kowalewicz & Coffee, 2014;Madaus, Kehle, Madaus, & Bray, 2003), and high school students (Schanding & Sterling-Turner, 2010). It has been used to reduce off-task and disruptive behavior (Kehle et al, 2000;Murphy et al, 2007) and to improve homework completion (Madaus et al, 2003;Moore, Waguespack, Wickstrom, Witt, & Gaydos, 1994).…”
Section: Add Mystery!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, experimenters placed a written description of the consequence in an envelope or box stamped with a question mark and publically displayed the envelope or box while the students worked on the task, thereby shrouding it in mystery while making it clear that something good would happen if the criterion was met (Kehle et al., ). In other studies, experimenters displayed a jar full of slips of paper describing reinforcers that were randomly selected after students met their goal (Kelshaw‐Levering et al., ; Kowalewicz & Coffee, ). Finally, in some studies, experimenters used MM to establish a variable schedule of reinforcement by secretly marking a calendar on random days to indicate that reinforcement was available, and then requiring students to meet the performance criterion before revealing whether reinforcement was available that day (Madaus et al., ; Moore et al., ).…”
Section: Make ‘Em Wanna Do It Through Choice and Mysterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If reinforcement is available that day, students are given an unknown randomly selected reinforcer. If reinforcement is not available that day, then reinforcement is withheld and students are reminded that they will have another opportunity to earn a prize the following day (Kowalewicz & Coffee, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mystery Motivator intervention has been utilized to improve homework completion and accuracy (Madaus, Kehle, Madaus, & Bray, ), and decrease disruptive behaviors (Kowalewicz & Coffee, ; Murphy, Theodore, Aloiso, Alric‐Edwards, & Hughes, ; Robichaux & Gresham, ). The intervention has been reported as acceptable for teachers, as it requires minimal teacher time, training, and materials (e.g., Beeks & Graves, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%