2012
DOI: 10.16995/sim.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myths, Matricide and Maternal Subjectivity in Irigaray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irigaray connects the double negation of the mother with the constitution of the phallic father as the signifier of social law (Irigaray 1991, 36). This law justifies and naturalizes women's banishment from Western culture (Green 2012, 3–4). Phallocentrism also coalesces the father, as a model of subjectivity, with his role as the head of the patriarchal family and as a political leader.…”
Section: Matricide As a Psychosocial Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irigaray connects the double negation of the mother with the constitution of the phallic father as the signifier of social law (Irigaray 1991, 36). This law justifies and naturalizes women's banishment from Western culture (Green 2012, 3–4). Phallocentrism also coalesces the father, as a model of subjectivity, with his role as the head of the patriarchal family and as a political leader.…”
Section: Matricide As a Psychosocial Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%