2007
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/78/21004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N = 1/2 supersymmetric gauge theory in noncommutative space

Abstract: A formulation of (non-anticommutative) N=1/2 supersymmetric U (N ) gauge theory in noncommutative space is studied. We show that at one loop UV/IR mixing occurs. A generalization of Seiberg-Witten map to noncommutative and non-anticommutative superspace is employed to obtain an action in terms of commuting fields at first order in the noncommutativity parameter θ. This leads to abelian and non-abelian gauge theories whose supersymmetry transformations are local and non-local, respectively.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as our original theory had Af = 1 supersymmetry, the resultant theory after this modification only has Af -1/2 supersymmetry. Unlike the four-dimensional case [20][21][22][23][24][25], we cannot break the supersymmetry of a three-dimensional theory with Af = 1 supersymmetry to AT -1/2 supersymmetry by using nonanticommutativity. This is because in four dimensions there are enough degrees of freedom to partially break the Af -1 supersymmetry.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Supersymmetrymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, as our original theory had Af = 1 supersymmetry, the resultant theory after this modification only has Af -1/2 supersymmetry. Unlike the four-dimensional case [20][21][22][23][24][25], we cannot break the supersymmetry of a three-dimensional theory with Af = 1 supersymmetry to AT -1/2 supersymmetry by using nonanticommutativity. This is because in four dimensions there are enough degrees of freedom to partially break the Af -1 supersymmetry.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Supersymmetrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The terminology Af = 1/2 supersymmetry is borrowed from nonanticommutative deformation of a theory in four dimensions. This is because in four dimen sions, it is also possible to break half the supersymmetry of a theory by deforming the theory to a nonanticommutative superspace [20][21][22][23][24][25]. So, if nonanticommutativity is imposed on a four-dimensional theory with Af = 1 supersymmetry, the resultant theory is called a theory with Af = 1/2 supersymmetry, as it preserves only half the supersymmetry of the original theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives rise to a nonanticommutative deformation of the field theory, which in turn breaks half of its supersymmetry. Four-dimensional theories with N = 1/2 supersymmetry have been constructed by using non-anticommutative deformations of theories with N = 1 supersymmetry [43][44][45][46][47][48]. On the other hand, it is not possible to construct a three-dimensional theory with N = 1/2 supersymmetry using a non-anticommutative deformation of the superspace.…”
Section: So(1 3)] × [So(8)/so(7)] ⊂ O Sp(8|4)/[so(1 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such noncommutative deformation of ordinary field theories has motivated the study of non-anticommutative deformation of supersymmetric field theories [5]- [6]. The non-anticommutative deformation of supersymmetric gauge theories has also been studied [7]- [8]. In this deformation, the Grassmann coordinate of a superspace are promoted to non-anticommutating coordinates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%