2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2016)041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N = 1 $$ \mathcal{N}=1 $$ Euler anomaly flow from dilaton effective action

Abstract: We consider N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theories in the conformal window. The running of the gauge coupling is absorbed into the metric by applying a suitable matter superfield-and Weyl-transformation. The computation becomes equivalent to one of a free theory in a curved background carrying the information of the renormalisation group flow. We use the techniques of conformal anomaly matching and dilaton effective action, by Komargodski and Schwimmer, to rederive the difference of the Euler anomaly coefficient … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since propagators of massive fields Φ (s) of spin s contain terms scaling like (k 2 ) s−1 , the representation in (37) diverges in the UV for conformally coupled fields of spin 1 and higher. 14 UV-convergent cases include the previously quoted free spin 0 (conformally coupled) and spin 1/2 particles for which we find results (cf. section 3.4) in accordance with direct R-computations [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since propagators of massive fields Φ (s) of spin s contain terms scaling like (k 2 ) s−1 , the representation in (37) diverges in the UV for conformally coupled fields of spin 1 and higher. 14 UV-convergent cases include the previously quoted free spin 0 (conformally coupled) and spin 1/2 particles for which we find results (cf. section 3.4) in accordance with direct R-computations [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…appendix C for further remarks. 14 This seems linked to the scheme-dependence found for direct evaluation of the spin 1 term via (3) cf. [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations