2001
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1263(200012)20:1+<::aid-jat671>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-acetylcysteine and endothelial cell injury by sulfur mustard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another mechanism by which extracellular GSH could protect the cells from CEES-induced damage is its possible extracellular conjugation with CEES, preventing CEES from entering the cell and causing its toxic effects (Salmen et al, 2005). Although the protective effects of 10 and 50 mM NAC have been shown in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages and endothelial cells (Atkins et al, 2000;Paromov et al, 2008), respectively, we observed both the protective and therapeutic effects of NAC at a 50 mM concentration against CEES-caused decrease in cell viability. The efficacy of NAC in ameliorating CEES-caused toxicity was stronger than that of GSH in HaCaT cells, which could be due to better uptake of GSH in JB6 cells compared with HaCaT cells as observed in this study, even though the GSH levels in control JB6 cells were lower than those in HaCaT cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another mechanism by which extracellular GSH could protect the cells from CEES-induced damage is its possible extracellular conjugation with CEES, preventing CEES from entering the cell and causing its toxic effects (Salmen et al, 2005). Although the protective effects of 10 and 50 mM NAC have been shown in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages and endothelial cells (Atkins et al, 2000;Paromov et al, 2008), respectively, we observed both the protective and therapeutic effects of NAC at a 50 mM concentration against CEES-caused decrease in cell viability. The efficacy of NAC in ameliorating CEES-caused toxicity was stronger than that of GSH in HaCaT cells, which could be due to better uptake of GSH in JB6 cells compared with HaCaT cells as observed in this study, even though the GSH levels in control JB6 cells were lower than those in HaCaT cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…CEES-caused mitochondrial oxidative damage and altered mitochondrial membrane potential are also reported in lung, liver, and other tissues, further indicating a role of oxidative stress in CEES-caused toxicity (Jafari, 2007;Gould et al, 2009;Black et al, 2010). Therefore, supplementing GSH or its precursors, including NAC, could help minimize this oxidative stress and reduce HD/CEES-caused toxicity, although its associated mechanism and defined biological systems are not well known (Amir et al, 1998;Atkins et al, 2000;Han et al, 2004;Arfsten et al, 2007;Paromov et al, 2007Paromov et al, , 2008. The protective role of extracellular GSH is highlighted in a study using the macrophage monocyte cell line J774 as well as in the mitotically active SVK 14 keratinocyte cell line (Smith et al, 1997;Amir et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their antioxidative potential and importance in skin pathophysiology had been tested previously in a large number of investigations [2,[11][12][13][14]. However, the delivery of antioxidants to skin remains problematic in some cases.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Cees/hd-induced Skin Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, NAC is an effective chemoprotectant against toxic side-effects associated with cancer chemotherapy (Gurtoo et al, 1983;Holoye et al, 1983;Unverferth et al, 1983) and provides clinical benefit to persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, probably by helping to neutraUze airway H2O2 formation (Kasielski and Nowak, 2001). In vitro experiments have also demonstrated the effectiveness of NAC in reducing or eliminating toxicity in various cell types (Atkins et al, 2000;Babich and Zuckerbraun, 2001;Noh et al, 1999;Park et al, 2002;Rao and Shaha, 2002;Recchioni et al, 2002;Ryu et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%