2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(11)60595-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-Acetylcysteine or Ascorbic Acid Versus Placebo to Prevent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Elective Cardiac Catheterization: A Single Center, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the RCT which enrolled only diabetes patients (n ¼ 134) showed higher incidence of CIN in the NAC group than group of hydration only (9.2% vs. 1.4%) without difference between the two groups for the mean maximal change in serum Cr measured 48-96 h after angiography, 33 but it should be noted that most patients in this RCT had a normal level of SCr. Another RCT 10 included in our study demonstrated lower incidence of CIN in the NAC group than the placebo group (28.4% vs. 35.0%) in 188 patients with both renal impartment and diabetes, although the benefit of NAC in prevention for CIN was not significant.…”
Section: Prevention Of Cin In Patients With Diabetescontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the RCT which enrolled only diabetes patients (n ¼ 134) showed higher incidence of CIN in the NAC group than group of hydration only (9.2% vs. 1.4%) without difference between the two groups for the mean maximal change in serum Cr measured 48-96 h after angiography, 33 but it should be noted that most patients in this RCT had a normal level of SCr. Another RCT 10 included in our study demonstrated lower incidence of CIN in the NAC group than the placebo group (28.4% vs. 35.0%) in 188 patients with both renal impartment and diabetes, although the benefit of NAC in prevention for CIN was not significant.…”
Section: Prevention Of Cin In Patients With Diabetescontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…However, recently in some randomized clinical trials, the benefit of NAC therapy for prevention of CIN had not been found in the population with pre-existing renal dysfunction or diabetes. 10,11 We therefore performed a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in order to evaluate the efficacy of NAC for the prevention of CIN among patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency or diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Brueck et al [92] prospectively randomized 520 patients who were undergoing CAG into 3 groups to receive (1) ascorbic acid 500 mg 24 h and 1 h before procedure, (2) NAC 600 mg 24 h and 1 h before procedure, and (3) placebo. All patients received intravenous 0.9% NaCl at a rate of 1 mL/kgBW/h from 12 h before to 12 h after the procedure.…”
Section: Pharmacological Strategies To Prevent Ci-akimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the absence of side effects, their findings did not warrant the use of antioxidants as a standard of care to prevent CIN. Another study conducted by Brueck et al [54] indicated that there was no evidence that standard dosage of NAC or ascorbic acid administered intravenously the day before and on the day of contrast dye exposure provided any benefit over placebo with respect to CIN prevention in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing cardiac catheterisation. They suggested that correct indication for the contrast media administration, peri-procedural hydration, the use of a small amount of low-osmolality contrast agent, and the avoidance of repetitive administration of closely spaced contrast dye remain the most important determinants in the prevention of CIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%