2006
DOI: 10.1002/cbf.1191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-acetyltransferase 2 gene polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma

Abstract: The acetylation polymorphism is a common inherited variation in human drug and carcinogen metabolism. Because N- acetyltransferase (NAT2) is important for the detoxification and/or bioactivation of drugs and carcinogens, polymorphisms of this gene have important implications in therapeutics of and susceptibility to cancer. In this study, NAT2 genotype (NAT2*5A (C(481)T), NAT2*6A (G(590)A), NAT2*7A/B (G(857)A)) and NAT2*14A (G(191)A) and phenotype were determined in 125 patients with colorectal carcinoma and 82… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…slow acetylation genotypes as the risk factor) [130,131], and finally an unexpected association with a rapid and a slow NAT2 variant allele in the same study [132] or increased frequency for a slow allele and decreased frequency for another slow allele among colorectal cancer patients [133], have been reported. The clinical significance of these findings is uncertain.…”
Section: Colon Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…slow acetylation genotypes as the risk factor) [130,131], and finally an unexpected association with a rapid and a slow NAT2 variant allele in the same study [132] or increased frequency for a slow allele and decreased frequency for another slow allele among colorectal cancer patients [133], have been reported. The clinical significance of these findings is uncertain.…”
Section: Colon Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The data are controversial as regards about NAT2 fast phenotypes and the development different kinds of cancer. Some authors observed relation between phenotypes and/or genotypes NAT2 of fast acetylation and a higher risk of CRC development [123][124][125][126][127]. We may highlight the meta-analysis conducted by Ye & Parry (2002) that included 4,431 cases and 4,547 controls and observed that, for NAT2 fast phenotype individuals, there was a risk of 1.51 (95%CI = 1.07 -2.12) for CRC, while no relation was observed for NAT2 fast genotype individuals [128].…”
Section: Nat2 Fast Phenotypes In Cancer Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may highlight the meta-analysis conducted by Ye & Parry (2002) that included 4,431 cases and 4,547 controls and observed that, for NAT2 fast phenotype individuals, there was a risk of 1.51 (95%CI = 1.07 -2.12) for CRC, while no relation was observed for NAT2 fast genotype individuals [128]. Some studies also suggest an increased CRC risk related to smoking and/or intake of red meat, associated to a higher frequency of NAT2 alleles of fast acetylation [106,107,125,126,[129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136]. When the risk association measure included smoking exposure and intake of alcohol, fast or intermediate NAT2 acetylator individuals (separately analyzed or in combination with other polymorphic genes), are more prevailing among patients with head and neck cancer [137][138][139][140][141].…”
Section: Nat2 Fast Phenotypes In Cancer Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterocyclic amine (HCA) from consumption of meat and fish could increase the risk for rectal cancer in men, but did not appreciably affect the risk for rectal cancer in women or for colon cancer in either sex (Le March et al , 2002; Chan et al 2005) reported an association between high intake of red meat and incidence of colorectal cancer risk, particularly among women with rapid acetylator NAT2 genotypes. Another study done in the southern region of Turkey suggested that the exposure to carcinogens through a high-protein diet might increase the risk of colorectal carcinoma only in genetically-susceptible individuals, with smoking status not differing between the control and patient group (Tamer et al , 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%