2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.312819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N- and C-terminal Domains Determine Differential Nucleosomal Binding Geometry and Affinity of Linker Histone Isotypes H10 and H1c

Abstract: Background: Linker histones are functionally heterogeneous. Results: Using a novel FRAP approach, the N-terminal domain modulates binding affinities of H1 0 and H1c; the C-terminal domain influences the nucleosomal orientation of the globular domain. Conclusion:The variable terminal domains have distinct roles in the chromatin binding characteristics of linker histones. Significance: Evidence for a structural basis for the functional heterogeneity of linker histones is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling suggests that a highly charged CTD compacts chromatin more effectively, resulting in silencing, whereas less-charged CTDs promote a chromatin folding in which the genome is more accessible (42). The N terminus, which is also unstructured, affects positioning and DNA binding affinity (43,44). While specific H1 binding modes may be FIG 3 Domain organization of H1, Hho1p, and HMO1.…”
Section: Linker Histonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling suggests that a highly charged CTD compacts chromatin more effectively, resulting in silencing, whereas less-charged CTDs promote a chromatin folding in which the genome is more accessible (42). The N terminus, which is also unstructured, affects positioning and DNA binding affinity (43,44). While specific H1 binding modes may be FIG 3 Domain organization of H1, Hho1p, and HMO1.…”
Section: Linker Histonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of CTD in condensing chromatin is related to its length, the density of basic residues, the number of S/TPXK sites and its specific amino acid composition, as well as the intrinsic protein disorder in the CTD [53, 68]. The N-terminal tail appears to be dispensable for chromatin binding, nevertheless, its deletion or swapping between different H1 variants alters the binding affinity of the respective H1 variant for chromatin [47, 48, 50]. Not surprisingly, different H1 variants also display differential in vivo binding dynamics in oocytes and during ES cell nuclear transfer [69].…”
Section: Overview: Histone H1 and Its Variants In Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to a substantial content of positively charged amino acids, the C-terminal domain of mutated histone H1.0 mediates the formation of a highly compacted chromatin state and the inhibition of DNA replication [14]. These findings together with other data stressing the individual impact of histone H1.0 globular [48] and terminal [13] domain on nucleosome surface interaction and chromatin binding affinity, respectively, indicate that histone H1.0 may evoke a characteristic chromatin environment by differential interactions with both DNA and potential partner proteins. Mutated histone H1.0 analyzed by photobleaching microscopy revealed two clusters of amino acid residues forming DNA-binding sites within the globular domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%