1999
DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-Ethylmaleimide-Modified Hsp70 Inhibits Protein Folding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in vitro alkylation of the three cysteines in the cytosolic yeast Hsp70 Ssa1 triggers a loss of ATPase activity and augments the capacity of Ssa1 to prevent aggregation of denatured luciferase (Liu et al, 1996; Hermawan and Chirico, 1999). Cys15 in Ssa1 is equivalent to the conserved BiP cysteine, and changes in chaperone activity for alkylated Ssa1 could occur through a mechanism similar to what we describe for BiP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in vitro alkylation of the three cysteines in the cytosolic yeast Hsp70 Ssa1 triggers a loss of ATPase activity and augments the capacity of Ssa1 to prevent aggregation of denatured luciferase (Liu et al, 1996; Hermawan and Chirico, 1999). Cys15 in Ssa1 is equivalent to the conserved BiP cysteine, and changes in chaperone activity for alkylated Ssa1 could occur through a mechanism similar to what we describe for BiP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1996). NEM-Ssa1 is incompetent for protein folding and competitively inhibits folding by unmodified Ssa1 (Hermawan and Chirico, 1999). These results provide biochemical support for our findings that substitution of C264 and C303 with aspartic acid caused apparent inactivation of Ssa1 as judged by complementation, resulting in constitutive Hsf1 derepression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, if cysteines are not important for the UL11-binding site, then why does NEM block the interaction? The most likely explanation is that the addition of hydrophobic NEM moieties distorts the UL11-binding site, similar to its affect on the conformation of other proteins, such as Hsp70 chaperone Ssa1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (10,27,41). However, NEM does not globally disrupt the conformation of UL16, because the modified protein is still capable of binding UL21 (26) and gE (74).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%