2008
DOI: 10.4141/cjss06006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N2O emissions from spring barley production as influenced by fertilizer nitrogen rate

Abstract: (1 N when fertilizer N rate was increased from 0 to 75 kg N ha(1 and from 75 to 150 kg N ha (1 , respectively, indicating increased N 2 O emissions when fertilizer is applied at above optimal rates. N 2 O emissions increased linearly with nitrate intensity, the summation of daily NO 3 -N concentrations for 0-to 15-cm depth. This suggests that the non-linearity in the relationship between fertilizer N rate and N 2 O emissions can be explained by the decreasing efficiency in crop NO 3 -N uptake at high fertilize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the application of fertilizers in April 2012 in systems S1, S2, and S3 did not immediately cause N 2 O emission peaks, a phenomenon also reported by Zebarth et al (2008). However, no significant correlation was established between soil N dynamics and the N 2 O emissions observed later.…”
Section: Intensity and Determinism Of Observed N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the application of fertilizers in April 2012 in systems S1, S2, and S3 did not immediately cause N 2 O emission peaks, a phenomenon also reported by Zebarth et al (2008). However, no significant correlation was established between soil N dynamics and the N 2 O emissions observed later.…”
Section: Intensity and Determinism Of Observed N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Seasonal patterns were accurately reproduced by the model, especially the high proportion of N 2 O emissions during spring and the low N 2 O emissions (Table 2). Despite the fact that no significant correlation was observed between measured N 2 O emissions and soil inorganic N dynamics, as is usually observed in fertilized soils (Zebarth et al 2008), simulated N 2 O emissions from systems S1, S2, and S3 appeared to be highly correlated with the response factors for soil nitrate content obtained using the nonlinear Fn function (Table 2). N 2 O emissions from system S5 simulated by NOE were determined more by the response factor for water contents (Table 2).…”
Section: Simulation Of N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This has been reported under maize [17,18] and spring barley [19]. Under these conditions, and when conditions are also conducive to denitrification, splitting fertilizer N applications could reduce N 2 O losses.…”
Section: Reduce Losses (B)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Under these conditions, and when conditions are also conducive to denitrification, splitting fertilizer N applications could reduce N 2 O losses. Data presented by Zebarth et al [19] suggest that lack of crop N uptake accounts for the relative increase in the proportion of mineral N that is emitted as N 2 O at high rates of N application. Dalal et al [20] state that NO 3 -usually inhibits full denitrification of N 2 O to N 2 , increasing the N 2 O:N 2 ratio.…”
Section: Reduce Losses (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, high fluxes in late April and May 2008 were observed after re-wetting of the soil by 32 mm of rainfall to reach a positive soil water balance. When soil is re-wetted after a dry period, a pulse of N 2 O has been observed by several authors due to increased nutrient availability for microbes (Mummey et al, 1994;Zebarth et al, 2008;Chirinda et al, 2010). Soil water content influences N 2 O emission from all types of soil.…”
Section: Fluxes and Soil Environmental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%